Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

eset_protect: add support for fields that were missed #12934

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025
Merged

eset_protect: add support for fields that were missed #12934

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

efd6
Copy link
Contributor

@efd6 efd6 commented Mar 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Proposed commit message

eset_protect: add support for fields that were missed

Sample event provided by user.

Field docs obtained from https://help.eset.com/protect_cloud/en-US/events-exported-to-json-format.html.

Checklist

  • I have reviewed tips for building integrations and this pull request is aligned with them.
  • I have verified that all data streams collect metrics or logs.
  • I have added an entry to my package's changelog.yml file.
  • I have verified that Kibana version constraints are current according to guidelines.
  • I have verified that any added dashboard complies with Kibana's Dashboard good practices

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Screenshots

@efd6 efd6 added bugfix Pull request that fixes a bug issue Integration:eset_protect ESET PROTECT Team:Security-Service Integrations Security Service Integrations Team [elastic/security-service-integrations] labels Mar 3, 2025
@efd6 efd6 self-assigned this Mar 3, 2025
@efd6 efd6 force-pushed the 12890-eset_protect branch from f43efe8 to 8169b41 Compare March 3, 2025 03:48
@efd6
Copy link
Contributor Author

efd6 commented Mar 3, 2025

/test

@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod
Copy link

🚀 Benchmarks report

To see the full report comment with /test benchmark fullreport

@efd6 efd6 marked this pull request as ready for review March 3, 2025 05:26
@efd6 efd6 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2025 05:26
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Pinging @elastic/security-service-integrations (Team:Security-Service Integrations)

@efd6 efd6 force-pushed the 12890-eset_protect branch from 8169b41 to e0077d9 Compare March 4, 2025 20:56
@efd6 efd6 enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2025 21:06
@elasticmachine
Copy link

💚 Build Succeeded

History

cc @efd6

@efd6 efd6 merged commit c14f711 into elastic:main Mar 4, 2025
6 checks passed
@elastic-sonarqube Elastic SonarQube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod
Copy link

Package eset_protect - 1.6.1 containing this change is available at https://epr.elastic.co/package/eset_protect/1.6.1/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@chrisberkhout chrisberkhout chrisberkhout approved these changes

Assignees

@efd6 efd6

Labels
bugfix Pull request that fixes a bug issue Integration:eset_protect ESET PROTECT Team:Security-Service Integrations Security Service Integrations Team [elastic/security-service-integrations]
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[eset_protect]: Add new fields
3 participants
@efd6 @elasticmachine @chrisberkhout