Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(prueba && terminal): update deps #4

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

enzonotario
Copy link
Member

@enzonotario enzonotario commented Sep 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated development dependencies for improved performance and features.
    • Incremented version of the xterminal package for potential enhancements.
    • Added Prettier for code formatting consistency across the project.
    • Introduced new test scripts for better testing command management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Minor visual adjustment in code frame output for better readability.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 19, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
editor ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 20, 2024 0:00am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@enzonotario has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f282f0 and 4c33b23.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several changes across different packages. Key modifications include updating variable declarations in test files for improved mutability handling, upgrading development dependencies in the prueba package, adjusting HTML output styles in a test file, incrementing the version of the xterminal dependency in the terminal package, and adding new scripts in various package configurations. Additionally, a new GitHub Actions workflow is introduced for continuous integration testing.

Changes

Files Change Summary
packages/esbabel/test/knownIssues.test.ts Renamed var get = 'prueba' to mut get = 'prueba' for improved mutability handling.
packages/prueba/package.json Updated devDependencies with newer versions for concurrently, log-symbols, typescript, vite, and vitest.
packages/sandbox/test/utils/codeFrame.test.ts Removed white-space: pre-wrap; style from a <span> element in the HTML output.
packages/terminal/package.json Updated xterminal dependency from ^2.0.8 to ^2.1.9.
.github/workflows/test.yml Added a new GitHub Actions workflow for CI/CD, running tests across multiple OS and Node.js versions.
package.json Modified the "test" script to run tests using pnpm --stream -r run test:run.
packages/cli/package.json Added a test:run script that outputs an error message indicating no test is specified.
packages/core/package.json Added prettier package to dependencies for code formatting.
packages/language-tools/package.json Added a test:run script that outputs an error message indicating no tests are specified.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant A as Developer
    participant B as Codebase
    participant C as Dependency Manager
    participant D as CI/CD System

    A->>B: Update variable declaration
    A->>B: Upgrade devDependencies
    A->>B: Adjust HTML output style
    A->>C: Update xterminal dependency
    C->>B: Apply new dependency versions
    A->>B: Modify test scripts
    A->>D: Add new CI/CD workflow
    D->>B: Run tests across environments

Poem

🐇 In the code where rabbits play,
Changes hop in bright array.
Variables now mutable, oh so neat,
Dependencies updated, can't be beat!
With styles refined, our tests will shine,
In the world of code, all is fine! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6ba1d7 and 7ab1fe3.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • packages/prueba/pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
  • packages/terminal/pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (4)
  • packages/esbabel/test/knownIssues.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/prueba/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/sandbox/test/utils/codeFrame.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/terminal/package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • packages/sandbox/test/utils/codeFrame.test.ts
  • packages/terminal/package.json
Additional comments not posted (5)
packages/prueba/package.json (5)

14-14: Verify compatibility and review changelog for concurrently update.

The concurrently dependency has been updated from version 7.x to 8.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's development workflow.

Please review the changelog or release notes of concurrently to understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.


15-15: Verify compatibility and review changelog for log-symbols update.

The log-symbols dependency has been updated from version 5.x to 7.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's logging functionality.

Please review the changelog or release notes of log-symbols to understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.


16-16: Verify compatibility, review changelog, and test TypeScript code for typescript update.

The typescript dependency has been updated from version 4.x to 5.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's TypeScript code.

Please take the following actions:

  1. Review the changelog or release notes of typescript to understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.
  2. Thoroughly test the TypeScript code in the package to ensure compatibility with the new version of typescript.

17-17: Verify compatibility, review changelog, and test build process and development server for vite update.

The vite dependency has been updated from version 4.x to 5.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's build process and development server.

Please take the following actions:

  1. Review the changelog or release notes of vite to understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.
  2. Thoroughly test the package's build process and development server to ensure compatibility with the new version of vite.

18-18: Verify compatibility, review changelog, and run and verify test cases for vitest update.

The vitest dependency has been updated from version 0.x to 2.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's testing setup and test cases.

Please take the following actions:

  1. Review the changelog or release notes of vitest to understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.
  2. Thoroughly run and verify the package's test cases to ensure compatibility with the new version of vitest.

packages/esbabel/test/knownIssues.test.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7ab1fe3 and 1f282f0.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • packages/core/pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/cli/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/language-tools/package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • packages/cli/package.json
  • packages/core/package.json
  • packages/language-tools/package.json
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/workflows/test.yml (6)

3-10: LGTM!

Triggering the workflow on both pushes and pull requests to the main branch is a good practice. It ensures that the tests are run for every change merged into the main branch and for every pull request.


16-20: LGTM!

The matrix strategy configuration looks good:

  • Using the latest LTS version of Node.js is a good practice.
  • Running the tests on both Ubuntu and Windows ensures cross-platform compatibility.
  • Setting fail-fast to false ensures that all jobs in the matrix are run even if one of them fails.

22-32: LGTM!

The checkout and setup steps look good:

  • The checkout step is using the latest version of the actions/checkout action, which is a good practice.
  • The pnpm setup step is using version 9, which is the latest version at the time of this review.
  • The Node.js setup step is using the version specified in the matrix and enabling caching for pnpm.

34-35: LGTM!

Running pnpm -r i is a good practice to install dependencies recursively. It ensures that all dependencies are installed in the correct order.


37-38: LGTM!

Running pnpm -r run build is a good practice to build the project recursively. It ensures that all packages are built in the correct order.


40-41: LGTM!

Running pnpm run test is a good practice to run the tests. It ensures that the tests are run using the pnpm package manager.

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
"build": "pnpm --stream -r run build",
"bump": "/bin/bash scripts/bump.sh",
"release": "/bin/bash scripts/release.sh",
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1",
"test": "pnpm --stream -r run test:run",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Standardize test scripts across packages and update placeholder scripts

The repository has a good testing structure with Vitest as the primary testing framework. However, there are some inconsistencies in the test script naming and implementation across packages:

  1. The root package.json uses "test": "pnpm --stream -r run test:run", but not all packages have a test:run script.
  2. Most packages use "test": "vitest" or "test:run": "vitest run", but some still have placeholder scripts.

To resolve these issues and improve the testing setup:

  1. Standardize test scripts across all packages:
    • Use "test": "vitest" for interactive testing
    • Add "test:run": "vitest run" for CI/CD environments
  2. Update packages with placeholder scripts to use Vitest
  3. Consider aligning the root package.json "test" script with package-level scripts:
    • Change to "test": "pnpm --stream -r run test" for interactive testing
    • Add "test:run": "pnpm --stream -r run test:run" for CI/CD environments

These changes will ensure consistent test execution across the entire project and resolve the current mismatch between the root script and package-level scripts.

Analysis chain

Approve the changes to the "test" script.

The updated "test" script enhances the testing process by enabling actual test execution using the command pnpm --stream -r run test:run. This promotes a more structured approach to testing and improves the functionality compared to the previous placeholder script.

Consider the following additional suggestions:

  1. Add a pretest script to run any necessary setup steps before running the tests, such as database seeding or environment variable configuration.
  2. Add a posttest script to run any necessary cleanup steps after running the tests, such as database teardown or artifact cleanup.

Ensure that the test:run script is defined in the package.json files of the individual packages for the tests to run successfully.

Run the following script to verify the existence of the test:run script in the package.json files:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `test:run` script is defined in the `package.json` files of the individual packages.

# Test: Search for `package.json` files in the sub-directories and check if they contain the `test:run` script.
# Expect: Each `package.json` file should have a `test:run` script defined.
fd package.json --exec bash -c 'grep -q "\"test:run\"" {} || echo "Missing test:run script in {}"'

Length of output: 1113


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for test-related scripts in package.json files and look for test files/directories

# Search for test-related scripts in package.json files
echo "Test-related scripts in package.json files:"
fd package.json --exec jq -r 'select(.scripts != null) | .scripts | to_entries[] | select(.key | test("test")) | "\(.parent.filename): \(.key): \(.value)"'

echo -e "\nTest files and directories:"
# Look for test files (common test file extensions)
fd -e test.js -e spec.js -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.vue -e spec.vue

# Look for test directories
fd -t d -d 2 '^(test|tests|__tests__)$'

Length of output: 2856

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant