Skip to content

change(partitions): Reorder No OTA TinyUF2 partition scheme to come first on 4MB boards #11692

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tyeth
Copy link
Contributor

@tyeth tyeth commented Aug 4, 2025

Reorders the No OTA partition to come first in the partition scheme list for Adafruit 4MB boards.

Mostly won't affect existing users as the Arduino IDE appears to cache previously selected partition scheme for board targets, but for any new users and unused boards the IDE will now default to using the TinyUF2 No OTA partition scheme for uploading the Arduino Blink Example, etc.

This matches the CircuitPython 10 partition scheme, new tinyUF2 default (combined.bin), and WipperSnapper (v107+) for 4MB ESP32-S2 and S3 Adafruit boards.

Brings adafruit#23 upstream.

tyeth and others added 2 commits July 29, 2025 16:56
change(partitions): Reorder No OTA TinyUF2 partition scheme to come first on 4MB boards
@tyeth tyeth requested a review from P-R-O-C-H-Y as a code owner August 4, 2025 12:50
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Messages
📖 🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello tyeth, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against eeab5cf

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants