-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Increase default gas limit from 30M to 36M #30897
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a no from my side. See https://ethresear.ch/t/on-increasing-the-block-gas-limit-technical-considerations-path-forward/21225/2?u=holiman for a pretty good answer why
Leaving the PR open to hear other voices
If we don't speak in terms of objective measures, we will all speak past each other. It is true that the storage space required grows indefinitely and this is a ticking time bomb if nothing is done. I don't understand what the point of no return is with regards to database size. Do we have any way to gather metrics on the disk sizes of validators or would that be considered spyware? We basically need to have a projected trajectory of storage space growth in the worst case (all gas in every block is used to increase the db size the greatest amount possible, which may not be the same between implementations) and map that to when it will hit the point of no return under different gas limits. @sslivkoff has done a good job looking at the data here. My understanding is that EIP-4444 is required before we get to the point of no return, so increasing the gas limit now increases the priority of EIP-4444 being shipped to production |
Haven't heard a lot of voices. I'll just close this |
Some additional reasons,
So it's not only about what the "network can handle" in some sort of p2p traffic scenario. |
just to add some context here: 33% of validators on ethereum mainnet is signaling an increase. probably to 36 million. |
@Giulio2002 We have no objection to validators independently raising their own gas limits, as this decision is community-driven. However, we want to avoid explicitly signaling that the Geth team advocates for increasing the network-wide gas limit. |
NethermindEth/nethermind#7879
erigontech/erigon#13057