Skip to content

Improve fsspec-proxy dependency groups #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

danyeaw
Copy link
Collaborator

@danyeaw danyeaw commented May 22, 2025

It took me a little time to figure out why I was getting a Filesystem Initialization error. This PR updates the README and the dependency group names to make things more clear.

@danyeaw danyeaw requested a review from martindurant May 22, 2025 17:00
`%APPDATA%\pip\pip.ini` (on Windows) and add:

[global]
extra-index-url = https://pypi.anaconda.org/anaconda-cloud/simple
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's possible to add this as a command line arg, right?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @martindurant, thanks for the feedback, I added a 2nd method with the CLI argument.

Comment on lines 40 to 41
"s3fs",
"anaconda-cloud-storage"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can make these relative to the other groups

Suggested change
"s3fs",
"anaconda-cloud-storage"
".[s3]",
".[anaconda]"

so that if the other groups change, we don't have to edit in two places.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately, we got a syntax error with this. I like the idea though, so I used the brand new PEP735 dependency groups feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants