Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce system address family #1470

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fujiapple852
Copy link
Owner

@fujiapple852 fujiapple852 commented Jan 8, 2025

Closes #1469

@fujiapple852 fujiapple852 force-pushed the feat-dns-first-to-respond branch 3 times, most recently from 6952b4f to 796846f Compare January 8, 2025 14:02
@fujiapple852 fujiapple852 marked this pull request as draft January 8, 2025 14:06
@c-git
Copy link
Collaborator

c-git commented Jan 8, 2025

I took a look at the code but it would take a deeper dive to answer the question I was looking for so just asking instead. Would the IP family stay consistent after startup or would it be possible for it to change per trip?

@fujiapple852 fujiapple852 force-pushed the feat-dns-first-to-respond branch from 796846f to 605764e Compare January 14, 2025 13:30
@fujiapple852 fujiapple852 changed the title Feat dns first to respond Introduce system address family Jan 14, 2025
@fujiapple852 fujiapple852 force-pushed the feat-dns-first-to-respond branch from 605764e to a38a5b0 Compare January 14, 2025 13:50
@fujiapple852
Copy link
Owner Author

Would the IP family stay consistent after startup or would it be possible for it to change per trip?

It will stay consistent, it is only resolved at startup.

@fujiapple852 fujiapple852 force-pushed the feat-dns-first-to-respond branch from a38a5b0 to bf5ff01 Compare January 14, 2025 13:55
@fujiapple852 fujiapple852 force-pushed the feat-dns-first-to-respond branch from bf5ff01 to 2a0a1b6 Compare January 14, 2025 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Prefer IPv6 over IPv4
2 participants