-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
Update ee_profiler.py #441
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for your contribution ! Could you share a small script that showcase this use case so we can add it to the tests ? and also I'm not sure it's necessary to add so many lines to cover your problem and the default behaviour, the join could be applied to all results and only affect description as the others are single element lists.
fix_description = False | ||
if headers[-1] == "Description": | ||
fix_description = True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could be done in 1 line:
fix_description = False | |
if headers[-1] == "Description": | |
fix_description = True | |
fix_description = headers[-1] == "Description" |
# Process each line of data after the header | ||
for line in lines[1:]: | ||
# Split the line by spaces, considering multiple spaces as a separator | ||
# Handle missing values denoted by "-" | ||
parts = line.split() | ||
part_result = dict(zip(headers, parts)) | ||
|
||
if fix_description: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the evaluation of the fix_description could actually be done directly in the if statement with the comment associated so it's clear it's only necessary there.
# Process each line of data after the header | ||
for line in lines[1:]: | ||
# Split the line by spaces, considering multiple spaces as a separator | ||
# Handle missing values denoted by "-" | ||
parts = line.split() | ||
part_result = dict(zip(headers, parts)) | ||
|
||
if fix_description: | ||
part_result["Description"] = " ".join(parts[len(headers) - 1 :]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actually open question, if we join them all, the other should not be affected as they are a 1 item list right ? So you might be able to simply add this mechanism to all part_results instead of just the description, avoiding the all if
statement in the process.
The default splitting splits the description and only takes the first part so we need to join the trailing parts dropped by the zip, when passed lists with different lengths.