dev-libs/gobject-introspection-common, dev-libs/gobject-introspection: Version bump to 1.84.0 #41166
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @e-luks dev-libs/gobject-introspection: @gentoo/gnome Linked bugsNo bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment. If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers. In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
gentoo-bot
added
assigned
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2025-03-19 08:58 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
|
Needs |
|
@thesamesam What do you mean exactly, i.e. this PR already contains a gobject-introspection-common bump, although very misleadingly not stated in the title: |
|
@thesamesam thumbs up please if one commit per package is the way to go for future PRs |
e-luks
changed the title
|
You should always be doing one commit per package, yes. |
Signed-off-by: Lukas Schmelting <[email protected]>
e-luks
force-pushed
the
gobject-introspection
branch
from
2223992 to
a1f1cce
Compare
Signed-off-by: Lukas Schmelting <[email protected]>
e-luks
force-pushed
the
gobject-introspection
branch
from
a1f1cce to
9af25e8
Compare
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2025-03-20 22:09 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
|
Mind also bumping |
|
I don't see a non-development release of |
|
On Saturday, 22 March 2025 at 10:36 AM, Sam James ***@***.***> wrote:
thesamesam left a comment (gentoo/gentoo#41166)
I don't see a non-development release of `glib-networking` tagged and glibmm was only tagged a few days ago. I don't see a need to include those in this PR.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
Oh I see. It would be nice to see the whole glib/gobject family be the same version in ::gentoo
|
|
It doesn't really work that way, though. They're not released at the same time. Just roughly around the same time (within a month or so usually). Sometimes not at all for e.g. glib-networking IIRC (often ends up skipping a release I think). |
|
Merged but I had to fix two issues:
Thanks! |
|
This is responsible for various "error: unknown child element doc:format in repository" bugs. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=952806 I had the same issue with dev-libs/libgit2-glib (no open bug for that issue yet). So more packages with the same error will pop up with future tinderbox runs. Downgrading dev-libs/gobject-introspection-1.84.0 to 1.82.0-r2 fixed the issue for me. Those are the relevant upstream changes: @thesamesam : maybe consider masking version 1.84.0? |
|
@MeisterP thabks, can you file a bug with that, then when I'm back at the computer I'll mask? |
|
Please check all the boxes that apply:
Signed-off-byline to every commit in the pull request.pkgcheck scan --commits --netto check for issues with my commits.Please note that all boxes must be checked for the pull request to be merged.