Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(helper): Added ValueOf test case #38

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2023
Merged

test(helper): Added ValueOf test case #38

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

flc1125
Copy link
Contributor

@flc1125 flc1125 commented Dec 20, 2023

No description provided.

Copy link

what-the-diff bot commented Dec 20, 2023

PR Summary

  • Enhanced Testing for ValueOf Function
    A set of new test cases have been introduced to ensure the ValueOf function assigns values to the elements of data structures correctly. This increase in testing coverage helps guarantee the function's robustness and accuracy.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (285932e) 69.94% compared to head (d95dede) 69.94%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #38   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.94%   69.94%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines         589      589           
=======================================
  Hits          412      412           
  Misses        170      170           
  Partials        7        7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@flc1125 flc1125 merged commit e91f314 into master Dec 20, 2023
6 checks passed
@flc1125 flc1125 deleted the test-valueof branch December 20, 2023 03:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant