Skip to content

update support ticket to support categories, project, and target options #6689

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

egoodwinx
Copy link

@egoodwinx egoodwinx commented Apr 1, 2025

Background

Updated the support ticket to include categories as well as optionally allow selection of the project and target.

#6622

Description

Update the TargetSelector and ProjectSelector

  • allow for optional selections (needs to be "unassigned" since empty text is not allowed).
  • update to toggle showing organization and project name

Update the Ticket page to allow for selection of the Target, Project, and Category

Update the mutation for new tickets to support the category, target, and project changes.

network sends the new inputs but I can't test further

image

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@egoodwinx egoodwinx marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2025 00:10
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ export default gql`

input SupportTicketCreateInput {
organizationSlug: String!
project: String
target: String
category: SupportCategory!
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor: I defer to my colleagues, but I think we should default this or make it nullable to avoid taking any downtime during the deployment window.

We don't get a ton of support tickets so I doubt it'd cause an issue, but I'm extra cautious.

@jdolle jdolle requested review from kamilkisiela and n1ru4l April 4, 2025 22:08
Copy link
Collaborator

@jdolle jdolle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work on this overall. These are pretty minor details that I'd prefer be slightly different.

@@ -568,6 +578,12 @@ export class SupportManager {
});
const customerType = this.resolveCustomerType(organization);

const formattedBody = ` "Category: " + ${request.data.category ? request.data.category : null}\n\n
"Project: " + ${request.data.project ? request.data.project : null}\n\n
"Target: " + ${request.data.target ? request.data.target : null}\n\n
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor: since this is just text and not jsx, I'd prefer "not selected" as the default over null

@@ -606,6 +622,9 @@ export class SupportManager {
metadata: {
ticketDescription: input.description,
ticketPriority: input.priority,
ticketCategory: input.category ?? '',
ticketProject: input.project ?? '',
ticketTarget: input.target ?? '',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

prefer not including the metadata if it isnt present here.
I.e. ...(input.category ? { ticketCategory: input.category } : {}),

Copy link
Contributor

@n1ru4l n1ru4l left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a few comments

@@ -95,6 +101,13 @@ export default gql`
fromSupport: Boolean!
}

enum SupportCategory {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use SupportCategoryType instead of SupportCategory in order to follow our guideline for new GraphQL schema additions.

Comment on lines +78 to +79
project: String
target: String
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not reference the Project and Target types here instead of String?

Comment on lines +33 to +34
project: String
target: String
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not use the project id and target id as the input here instead of the slug?
It would be a more stable reference compared to just the slug.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it not easier to read the ticket if we use the names?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Somewhat recently we added support for UUIDs in addition to paths (combination of slugs).
The reason for this change was because these UUIDs don't change if people rename things.

For a support ticket, we typically get to them quick enough that I dont think it would make a huge difference, but on the off chance that they change the name of a resource, a UUID would be better because then we don't need to ask again.

Readability isn't a concern -- it's all about being able to look up information in logs etc.

Comment on lines +77 to +79
category: SupportCategory!
project: String
target: String
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do these fields actually work? They are not used on the frontend.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are sent in the input but they may not be getting resolved.
For simplicty, I think these fields should be removed from the SupportTicket type. The requirement was to add this information to the support ticket body. I dont think we need it both in the body and in other fields.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants