Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add audio transport direction to WebRTCClientConfiguration #127851

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sdb9696
Copy link
Contributor

@sdb9696 sdb9696 commented Oct 7, 2024

Proposed change

Add audio transport direction to WebRTCClientConfiguration to enable two way audio.

Goes with Front end PR 22239

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

home-assistant bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Hey there @home-assistant/core, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (camera) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of camera can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign camera Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

@starkillerOG
Copy link
Contributor

@sdb9696 Will this also allow for 2-way audio on cameras with a RTSP stream that have a RTSP backchannel?
(RTSP stream beeing converted to WebRTC by the WebRTC integration)

Does the camera entity need to specify if that particular cam supports 2-way audio, or is this info automatically obtained from the stream?

@sdb9696
Copy link
Contributor Author

sdb9696 commented Nov 5, 2024

Hey @starkillerOG, I haven't tested it yet but it should work with RTSP back channel if the component doing the conversion supports it. Yes the integration has to specify that it supports 2-way via the WebRTCClientConfiguration. I'm just in the process of bringing the ring WebRtc PR up to date with latest async web offer functionality, then I'll update this PR and the front end PR. Hopefully some time today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants