Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plugwise Quality improvements #132175

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

CoMPaTech
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed change

Follow-up from #131888 review comments.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

home-assistant bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Hey there @bouwew, @frenck, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (plugwise) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of plugwise can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign plugwise Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

@joostlek joostlek changed the title Improve Plugwise Quality Scale Plugwise Quality improvements Dec 3, 2024
@joostlek joostlek marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2024 23:43
@joostlek joostlek requested a review from frenck as a code owner December 3, 2024 23:43
Copy link
Member

@joostlek joostlek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, merge conflicts

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft December 3, 2024 23:44
@home-assistant
Copy link

home-assistant bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@epenet
Copy link
Contributor

epenet commented Dec 4, 2024

Note: please check #131705 about missing data_description

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2024 07:54
@CoMPaTech
Copy link
Contributor Author

@epenet #132239
@joostlek should be mergeable again

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants