Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update documentation for metoffice to support migration to DataHub API #35954

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

avee87
Copy link
Contributor

@avee87 avee87 commented Nov 24, 2024

Proposed change

Metoffice integration is transitioning from Datapoint API to DataHub API which requires changes to documentation.

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Transitioned to the DataHub API for weather data integration.
    • Updated registration process for obtaining an API key to require a DataHub account.
    • Introduced a new weather entity type with enhanced forecast updates, including daily, twice-daily, and hourly updates.
  • Documentation

    • Revised documentation to reflect changes in API and registration processes.
    • Clarified details on sensor entities, including the addition of "pressure" and removal of "visibility distance."
    • Updated references to ensure access to the correct DataHub API resources.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo next This PR goes into the next branch labels Nov 24, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d761a90
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/67490e604f07db00080d5464
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-35954--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 24, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the documentation for the metoffice weather platform, transitioning from the Met Office's DataPoint API to the DataHub API. This includes modifications to the registration process for obtaining an API key, clarifications on the types of weather entities created, and updates to the list of sensor entities. The documentation has been revised to ensure users are directed to the correct resources for implementation and to reflect these changes accurately.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/_integrations/metoffice.markdown Updated documentation to transition from DataPoint API to DataHub API, including registration process, entity descriptions, and sensor entities. Added "pressure" as a new entity and removed "visibility distance." Adjusted default enabled sensor entities. Updated API documentation references.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant MetOffice
    participant DataHub

    User->>MetOffice: Request Weather Data
    MetOffice->>DataHub: Fetch Weather Data
    DataHub-->>MetOffice: Return Weather Data
    MetOffice-->>User: Provide Weather Data
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a7cc17 and d761a90.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/metoffice.markdown (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • source/_integrations/metoffice.markdown

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
source/_integrations/metoffice.markdown (2)

19-22: Fix formatting and enhance subscription details

The content is accurate but needs some formatting improvements and clarification.

Apply these changes:

-The `metoffice` weather platform uses the Met Office's [DataHub API](https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/services/data/met-office-weather-datahub) for weather data. 
+The `metoffice` weather platform uses the Met Office's [DataHub API](https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/services/data/met-office-weather-datahub) for weather data.
+
 ## Getting started
-1. Register for a [Met Office DataHub](https://datahub.metoffice.gov.uk/) account. 
-2. After registration, [subscribe](https://datahub.metoffice.gov.uk/profile/subscriptions) to [Site Specific Global Spot](https://datahub.metoffice.gov.uk/pricing/site-specific) dataset to obtain your API key. Free tier subscription gives 360 calls per day which is enough for using this integration
+
+1. Register for a [Met Office DataHub](https://datahub.metoffice.gov.uk/) account.
+2. After registration, [subscribe](https://datahub.metoffice.gov.uk/profile/subscriptions) to the [Site Specific Global Spot](https://datahub.metoffice.gov.uk/pricing/site-specific) dataset.
+   - The free tier subscription provides 360 calls per day, which is sufficient for this integration
+   - Your API key will be available after successful subscription
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)

19-19: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


21-21: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


20-20: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


20-20: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


21-21: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD032, blanks-around-lists)


19-19: Consider adding migration notes

Since this is a significant API transition from DataPoint to DataHub, users might benefit from migration instructions.

Consider adding a migration section:

## Migrating from DataPoint API

If you're upgrading from a previous version that used the DataPoint API:
1. You'll need to register for a new DataHub account
2. Your existing DataPoint API key will not work
3. Subscribe to the Site Specific Global Spot dataset
4. Reconfigure the integration with your new API key
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)

19-19: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a56744 and 9a7cc17.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/metoffice.markdown (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
source/_integrations/metoffice.markdown

19-19: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


21-21: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


20-20: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


20-20: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


21-21: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD032, blanks-around-lists)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/metoffice.markdown (1)

28-45: Verify the visibility entity status and improve section structure

The entities section needs clarification and verification.

  1. Please verify if the "visibility" entity should be in the list, as the AI summary indicates it was removed.

  2. Consider restructuring the entities section for better readability:

-This integration creates a number of weather entities for each entry created in the configuration by location: one weather entity with a summary and a forecast (twice-daily and hourly), and twelve sensor entities for individual reporting on each of the individual measurements. Note that only some of the sensor entities flagged below are enabled by default, so your system isn't overrun on initial configuration.
+This integration creates the following entities for each configured location:
+
+### Weather Entity
+- One weather entity providing:
+  - Current weather summary
+  - Twice-daily forecast
+  - Hourly forecast
+
+### Sensor Entities
+The following sensor entities are available (✓ = enabled by default):
+
+- "feels like" temperature
+- humidity
+- pressure ✓
+- probability of precipitation ✓
+- station name
+- temperature ✓
+- UV index
+- visibility
+- weather ✓
+- wind direction
+- wind gust
+- wind speed ✓
-Only probability of precipitation, pressure, temperature, weather and wind speed are enabled by default.


Details about the API are available in the [DataPoint API documentation](https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/services/data/datapoint/api-reference). The [DataPoint](https://github.com/EJEP/datapoint-python) library is used to retrieve data.
Details about the API are available in the [DataHub API documentation](https://datahub.metoffice.gov.uk/docs/f/category/site-specific/overview). The [datapoint-python](https://github.com/EJEP/datapoint-python) library is used to retrieve data.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as I have found clear evidence about the datapoint-python library's status with the Met Office integration:

Documentation needs update: datapoint-python library reference is outdated

The documentation is incorrect. According to the changelog entries from release 2024.2, while the datapoint-python library (v0.9.9) is still used, there were compatibility issues with the DataHub API that were reported upstream (EJEP/datapoint-python#183). The documentation should be updated to reflect this transition period and potential limitations.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify datapoint-python library compatibility with DataHub API

The documentation references the datapoint-python library, but the integration has moved to the DataHub API.

Please verify:

  1. Is the datapoint-python library still used with the DataHub API?
  2. If yes, does it support the DataHub API?
  3. If no, should we update the library reference?

Run this script to check the core implementation:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if and how datapoint-python is used in the core implementation
rg -A 5 "datapoint" $(fd -t f -e py metoffice)

Length of output: 8390

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo next This PR goes into the next branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant