Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document config flow setup in geniushub #36048

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: current
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joostlek
Copy link
Member

@joostlek joostlek commented Nov 28, 2024

Proposed change

Document config flow setup in geniushub

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

  • Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
  • Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced documentation for the geniushub integration with new configuration options for both cloud and local APIs.
    • Added a new "Prerequisites" section for clarity on setup requirements.
    • Improved structure and readability of setup instructions, making it easier for users to connect Genius Hub to Home Assistant.
    • Added reference to configuration flow guidance for better user support.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the current This PR goes into the current branch label Nov 28, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0c63db8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/674d778e7c5e2a000801992a
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-36048--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request enhance the documentation for the geniushub integration with Home Assistant. A new section detailing configuration options for both the cloud API and the local API has been added, clarifying their usage. The previous configuration section has been removed and integrated into the main documentation body for improved clarity. Additionally, a reference to a configuration flow file has been included to aid in setup instructions. Other sections remain largely unchanged but are now better contextualized.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown Added a new section on configuration options for cloud and local APIs; removed old configuration section; included reference to configuration flow file; improved overall structure for readability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant HomeAssistant
    participant GeniusHub

    User->>HomeAssistant: Initiate setup for Genius Hub
    HomeAssistant->>User: Present configuration options
    User->>HomeAssistant: Choose Cloud API or Local API
    HomeAssistant->>GeniusHub: Connect using selected API
    GeniusHub-->>HomeAssistant: Provide access
    HomeAssistant-->>User: Setup complete
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1)

31-34: Consider adding security and reliability notes.

The configuration options are well-documented and clearly explain both methods. However, consider adding:

  1. Security implications of using the local API (if any)
  2. More specific details about the speed difference between APIs
  3. Reliability considerations for both methods

Consider adding a note like:

 The local API is unofficial, but is faster and has more features, while the cloud API is slower.
+The local API requires your Hub to be accessible on your local network, while the cloud API works from anywhere.
+Note: When using the local API, ensure your network is secure as it requires your login credentials.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acd277b and f2c1ea0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1)

29-29: LGTM: Config flow template inclusion is correct.

The inclusion of the standard config flow template aligns with Home Assistant's documentation practices and the frontmatter configuration.

Comment on lines 31 to 34
You can configure the integration either via the cloud API or the local API.
The local API is unofficial, but is faster and has more features, while the cloud API is slower.
To configure the local API, you require your **username** and **password** as used with [geniushub.co.uk/app](https://www.geniushub.co.uk/app).
To configure the cloud API, you require a **hub token** obtained from [my.geniushub.co.uk](https://my.geniushub.co.uk/).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe place these as pre requirements sections above the config flow setup?

@home-assistant
Copy link

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft November 28, 2024 18:49
@joostlek joostlek marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 09:03
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1)

29-36: LGTM! Consider adding security note for local API.

The Prerequisites section is well-structured and provides clear information about both API options. The inclusion of specific URLs for obtaining credentials is helpful.

Consider adding a security note about storing credentials securely when using the local API, as it requires username and password.

 The local API is unofficial, but is faster and has more features, while the cloud API is slower.
+
+Note: When using the local API, ensure your credentials are stored securely and not exposed in configuration files or logs.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2c1ea0 and 0c63db8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1)

38-38: LGTM! Config flow placement is correct.

The config flow include is properly placed after the Prerequisites section, following a logical progression from requirements to setup steps.

This addresses the previous review comment about placing prerequisites above config flow setup.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
current This PR goes into the current branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants