-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document config flow setup in geniushub #36048
base: current
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in the pull request enhance the documentation for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant HomeAssistant
participant GeniusHub
User->>HomeAssistant: Initiate setup for Genius Hub
HomeAssistant->>User: Present configuration options
User->>HomeAssistant: Choose Cloud API or Local API
HomeAssistant->>GeniusHub: Connect using selected API
GeniusHub-->>HomeAssistant: Provide access
HomeAssistant-->>User: Setup complete
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1)
31-34
: Consider adding security and reliability notes.The configuration options are well-documented and clearly explain both methods. However, consider adding:
- Security implications of using the local API (if any)
- More specific details about the speed difference between APIs
- Reliability considerations for both methods
Consider adding a note like:
The local API is unofficial, but is faster and has more features, while the cloud API is slower. +The local API requires your Hub to be accessible on your local network, while the cloud API works from anywhere. +Note: When using the local API, ensure your network is secure as it requires your login credentials.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1)
29-29
: LGTM: Config flow template inclusion is correct.
The inclusion of the standard config flow template aligns with Home Assistant's documentation practices and the frontmatter configuration.
You can configure the integration either via the cloud API or the local API. | ||
The local API is unofficial, but is faster and has more features, while the cloud API is slower. | ||
To configure the local API, you require your **username** and **password** as used with [geniushub.co.uk/app](https://www.geniushub.co.uk/app). | ||
To configure the cloud API, you require a **hub token** obtained from [my.geniushub.co.uk](https://my.geniushub.co.uk/). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe place these as pre requirements sections above the config flow setup?
Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1)
29-36
: LGTM! Consider adding security note for local API.The Prerequisites section is well-structured and provides clear information about both API options. The inclusion of specific URLs for obtaining credentials is helpful.
Consider adding a security note about storing credentials securely when using the local API, as it requires username and password.
The local API is unofficial, but is faster and has more features, while the cloud API is slower. + +Note: When using the local API, ensure your credentials are stored securely and not exposed in configuration files or logs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/geniushub.markdown (1)
38-38
: LGTM! Config flow placement is correct.
The config flow include is properly placed after the Prerequisites section, following a logical progression from requirements to setup steps.
This addresses the previous review comment about placing prerequisites above config flow setup.
Proposed change
Document config flow setup in geniushub
Type of change
current
branch).current
branch).next
branch).next
branch).Additional information
Checklist
current
branch.next
branch.Summary by CodeRabbit
geniushub
integration with new configuration options for both cloud and local APIs.