Skip to content

Conversation

sunsided
Copy link

@sunsided sunsided commented Jun 24, 2023

This adds support for RFC1864: The Content-MD5 Header Field.

I understand that Content-MD5 is not an HTTP/1.1 header and therefore doesn't necessarily fit in with the http and headers crates aiming at RFC7230 (only). Is such a contribution wished for anyway?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant