fix: remove score toggle if not applicable #1468
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@nas-tabchiche has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 15 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a conditional rendering logic in the Score component that determines the visibility of the Checkbox component based on the value of Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Score as Score Component
participant Check as Condition Evaluator
participant Checkbox as Checkbox Component
Score->>Check: Evaluate requirementAssessment.result
alt result equals "not_applicable"
Check-->>Score: Return false (skip Checkbox)
else
Check-->>Score: Return true (proceed with rendering)
Score->>Checkbox: Render Checkbox Component
end
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/compliance-assessments/[id=uuid]/table-mode/+page.svelte (2)
402-418: LGTM! Consider extracting the condition for reusability.The conditional rendering of the score toggle aligns well with the disabled state of the Score components. However, since this condition is used in multiple places, consider extracting it into a computed property.
<script lang="ts"> + $: isApplicable = (requirementAssessment) => requirementAssessment.result !== 'not_applicable'; // ... rest of the script </script> <!-- In the template --> - {#if requirementAssessment.result !== 'not_applicable'} + {#if isApplicable(requirementAssessment)} <Checkbox form={superForm(requirementAssessment.scoreForm, { id: `requirement-is-scored-${requirementAssessment.id}` })} field="is_scored" label={''} helpText={m.scoringHelpText()} checkboxComponent="switch" class="h-full flex flex-row items-center justify-center my-1" classesContainer="h-full flex flex-row items-center space-x-4" on:change={async () => { requirementAssessment.is_scored = !requirementAssessment.is_scored; await update(requirementAssessment, 'is_scored'); }} /> {/if}
399-400: Extract duplicated disabled state conditions.The disabled state conditions are duplicated between the Score components. Extract them into a computed property to improve maintainability.
<script lang="ts"> + $: isScoreDisabled = (requirementAssessment) => + !requirementAssessment.is_scored || requirementAssessment.result === 'not_applicable'; // ... rest of the script </script> <!-- In the template --> <Score // ... other props - disabled={!requirementAssessment.is_scored || - requirementAssessment.result === 'not_applicable'} + disabled={isScoreDisabled(requirementAssessment)} /> <Score // ... other props - disabled={!requirementAssessment.is_scored || - requirementAssessment.result === 'not_applicable'} + disabled={isScoreDisabled(requirementAssessment)} />Also applies to: 433-434
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/compliance-assessments/[id=uuid]/table-mode/+page.svelte(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: migrations-check (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
…results If you enable scoring, set result as not applicable, then set it back to another result, the scoring toggle appears on the 'off' position but the score slider is displayed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Checkbox.svelte (1)
39-39: Consider adding ARIA attributes for better accessibility.The class structure looks good, but consider adding
aria-disabledto match the visual disabled state:- <div class="flex flex-row space-x-2 items-center {classesDisabled(disabled)}"> + <div + class="flex flex-row space-x-2 items-center {classesDisabled(disabled)}" + aria-disabled={disabled}>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Checkbox.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/compliance-assessments/[id=uuid]/table-mode/+page.svelte(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/compliance-assessments/[id=uuid]/table-mode/+page.svelte
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Checkbox.svelte (1)
38-38: LGTM! Improved hidden state handling.Moving the hidden state logic to the container level is a better architectural choice as it ensures the entire component is hidden as a unit.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Style