-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 307
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: fall back on empty string when computing select option labels #1489
fix: fall back on empty string when computing select option labels #1489
Conversation
This fixes a chain of client-side errors on the applied controls form. The error did not affect the good functioning of the form, but was unclean.
WalkthroughThe changes primarily update the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant getOptions
participant append
Client->>+getOptions: Call getOptions(input)
getOptions->>+append: Process input via append()
append-->>-getOptions: Return value (or undefined)
getOptions-->>-Client: Return default '' if result is undefined
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts (1)
59-62
: LGTM! Consider adding type annotations for better type safety.The use of nullish coalescing operator is a good solution for handling undefined values and preventing client-side errors.
Consider adding type annotations to make the code more type-safe:
-const append = (x, y) => (!y ? x : !x || x == '' ? y : x + ' - ' + y); +const append = (x: string, y: string): string => (!y ? x : !x || x == '' ? y : x + ' - ' + y);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: migrations-check (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
0k
This fixes a chain of client-side errors on the applied controls form.
The error did not affect the good functioning of the form, but was
unclean.
Summary by CodeRabbit