fix: promise broken due to missing refactoring for projects

[eric-intuitem]

The Governance tab in analytics was not refreshed properly.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • The analytics dashboard has been updated with revised labeling. A key metric now displays an updated term that changes how the analytics data is presented, offering users a refreshed view of the information.

[Mohamed-Hacene]

0k

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update modifies the label text displayed on a CounterCard component within the analytics section. The label that previously sourced its text from m.projects() is now sourced from m.perimeters(). This change alters only the wording in the user interface without affecting any underlying logic or functionality.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/…/+page.svelte	Updated the CounterCard label from m.projects() to m.perimeters()

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits roam,
A label change finds a brand new home.
From projects to perimeters, the words now sing,
A subtle hop with every refreshing spring.
I leap with joy—let these updates bloom! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e88791 and 7a44ea9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/analytics/+page.svelte (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)

• GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
• GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/analytics/+page.svelte (1)

329-333:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify consistency of the perimeter-related attributes.

The label change from projects to perimeters improves terminology. However, there are potential inconsistencies:

1. The href="/projects" still uses the old terminology
2. The counter still uses counters.projects
3. The icon fa-solid fa-cubes might need updating to better match "perimeters"

Let's verify if similar terminology changes exist in the codebase:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for occurrences of "projects" and "perimeters" in the codebase
echo "Searching for related terminology..."
rg -i "projects?" --type svelte
rg -i "perimeters?" --type svelte

Length of output: 214

---

Attention: Review and Confirm Consistency for Perimeter Elements

The label update to m.perimeters() is approved for clarity, but there are still a few potential inconsistencies in the Governance tab:

• The link (href="/projects") still refers to "projects" instead of the new "perimeters" concept.
• The counter value used (counters.projects) appears to be unchanged despite the label update; please verify if this should be updated to a corresponding perimeter counter.
• The icon (fa-solid fa-cubes) might not align with the "perimeters" theme and could need adjustment.

Please verify whether these elements should be updated for consistency or if the current behavior is intentional.

---

To further assist your verification, you might run the following script to search for occurrences in Svelte files:

Ensure that any related updates propagate consistently across the codebase before finalizing the change.

---

🏁 Script executed:

[run_scripts]
#!/bin/bash
echo "Searching for 'projects' in Svelte files"
rg -i "projects" -g "*.svelte"

echo "Searching for 'perimeters' in Svelte files"
rg -i "perimeters" -g "*.svelte"

Length of output: 2788

---

Focus on Consistency for Perimeter Terms

The update to use m.perimeters() for the label is a positive change for clarity. However, there are some discrepancies that require attention:

• Link URL: The href="/projects" still references the older terminology; it might need to be updated to "/perimeters" if the intention is to fully transition to the new naming.
• Counter Data: The counter remains sourced from counters.projects; ensure that this correctly reflects the perimeter metric or update it accordingly.
• Icon: The icon fa-solid fa-cubes may not visually align with the concept of "perimeters" and might be reconsidered.

Please verify these elements for consistency within the analytics and governance sections to ensure a uniform update.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.