Each function passes value or pointer to By rules #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rhafer
added a commit
to rhafer/ocis
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
invpop/validation is a fork of go-ozzo/ozzo-validation with some additional bug fixes. Specifically we need: invopop/validation#1
rhafer
added a commit
to rhafer/ocis
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
invpop/validation is a fork of go-ozzo/ozzo-validation with some additional bug fixes. Specifically we need: invopop/validation#1
rhafer
added a commit
to rhafer/ocis
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2024
invpop/validation is a fork of go-ozzo/ozzo-validation with some additional bug fixes. Specifically we need: invopop/validation#1
rhafer
added a commit
to rhafer/ocis
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2024
invpop/validation is a fork of go-ozzo/ozzo-validation with some additional bug fixes. Specifically we need: invopop/validation#1
rhafer
added a commit
to owncloud/ocis
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2024
invpop/validation is a fork of go-ozzo/ozzo-validation with some additional bug fixes. Specifically we need: invopop/validation#1
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a copy of go-ozzo/ozzo-validation#160
As per the original PR:
The combination of Elem().Interface() does not return a pointer, even if the original variable was a pointer. Passing by value to validation rules becomes a problem when the value is a struct with a private mutex. This is the case with structs generated with protoc-gen-go. go vet -copylocks illustrates the problem.
I acknowledge this may be a breaking change for some. If they have written custom rules, the rules receive an empty interface and have to cast the argument to the appropriate type. This argument will be a pointer in cases where it previously wasn't.