forked from Widen/cloudfront-auth
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Better support parallel execution by allowing wget to skip files… #33
Open
patrickherrera
wants to merge
2
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
31-using-the-module-in-a-loop-has-issues-downloading-the-lambda-package
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can now remove the call to
test -f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could, but wouldn't it then download the file unnecessarily if it already existed? But yes, the parallel execution is a real edge case and most of the time it will be running in CI where the file won't exist so I think it is safe to remove and satisfies any concerns that older version will hang around
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
--no-clobber
would prevent the file being unnecessarily downloadedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doh, yes you are right. I was thinking for some reason that it just prevented
wget
failing if it already existed, which is what I was originally looking to achieve.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really understand why the problem was consistently reproducible, because the
test -f
should usually preventwget
from downloading the file if it already exists. I would have thought it's pretty unlikely for one thread to start downloading the file while another thread is in-between thetest -f
andwget
commands. Using--no-clobber
would presumably prevent the problem completely though (depending on how it's implemented inwget
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If TF runs this step in parallel the
test
s would all run and return false and thenwget
would run and the first one to download wins and the rest fail. If wget downloads to a temporary file thetest
won't pick it up until it is has completed (after enough time for all the tests to run). Ifwget
creates the file immediately then yes, it does seem an unlikely coincidence. Would need to see the full TF output to better gauge the order things run in