feat: add link endpoint creation #93
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/app/utils/api.class.ts (2)
46-53: Implementation looks good, but consider some improvements.The
createEndpointmethod successfully implements the functionality to create an endpoint for a given link, which aligns with the PR objectives. However, there are a few suggestions to enhance its flexibility and robustness:
- Consider making the
urlPatha parameter instead of hardcoding it to '/$summary'. This would allow the creation of different types of endpoints if needed in the future.- Add input validation for the
linkIdparameter to ensure it's not empty or invalid.- Consider adding specific error handling or documentation about potential error scenarios.
Here's a suggested improvement:
async createEndpoint(linkId: string, urlPath: string = '/$summary') { if (!linkId) { throw new Error('linkId is required'); } return await this.create({ url: `/${EEndpoint.shareLinks}/${linkId}/endpoints`, data: { urlPath }, }); }This change maintains the current functionality while adding flexibility for future use cases.
46-53: Consider adding documentation for the new method.The
createEndpointmethod integrates well with the existing code structure and follows the established patterns in theApiSHLinkclass. To further improve its integration:
Add JSDoc comments to describe the method's purpose, parameters, and return value. This will help maintain consistency with other methods and improve code maintainability.
Consider mentioning that error handling for this method is managed by the axios interceptor at the bottom of the file, or if there are any specific error cases that should be handled differently.
Example documentation:
/** * Creates an endpoint for a specific share link. * @param linkId - The ID of the share link to create an endpoint for. * @returns A promise that resolves with the created endpoint data. * @throws Will throw an error if the request fails (handled by axios interceptor). */ async createEndpoint(linkId: string) { // ... existing implementation ... }src/app/shared-links/Components/AddLinkDialog.tsx (2)
52-64: Approve with suggestions: Enhance error handling and button state management.The changes in the
onSubmitFormfunction successfully implement the core functionality described in the PR objectives. However, consider the following improvements:
- Provide more specific error messages to help users understand what went wrong.
- Add logic to set
disableButtonback tofalseon successful submission.- Consider using a single try-catch block for both link and endpoint creation to simplify the error handling.
Here's a suggested refactor:
const onSubmitForm = async (data: TCreateSHLinkDto) => { setDisableButton(true); try { const transformedData = removeUndefinedValues(data); const { data: createdLink } = await apiSharedLink.createLink(transformedData); await apiSharedLink.createEndpoint(createdLink['id']); callback?.(); setDisableButton(false); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to create link or endpoint:', error); setHasError(true); setDisableButton(false); } };
89-95: Approve with suggestion: Enhance error message.The addition of the Alert component for error display is good and aligns with the PR objectives. However, the error message could be more informative to help users understand what went wrong and what they should do next.
Consider updating the error message to be more specific and actionable:
<Alert severity="error"> Failed to create the endpoint. Please try again or contact support if the problem persists. </Alert>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/app/shared-links/Components/AddLinkDialog.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/app/utils/api.class.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/app/utils/api.class.ts (1)
46-53: Verify implementation of remaining PR objectives.The
createEndpointmethod successfully implements the backend API call for endpoint creation, which is a key part of the PR objectives. However, some aspects mentioned in the PR objectives are not visible in this file:
- The submission dialog form activated by the enter button.
- Handling scenarios where endpoint creation fails.
- Locking feature for the creation button to prevent multiple submissions.
These features are likely implemented in the frontend components. To ensure full implementation of the PR objectives:
Please confirm that the following features are implemented in the appropriate frontend files:
- Submission dialog form with enter button activation.
- Error handling and alert display for failed endpoint creation.
- Creation button locking mechanism.
You can use the following script to search for these implementations:
This will help ensure that all aspects of the PR objectives are properly implemented across the codebase.
src/app/shared-links/Components/AddLinkDialog.tsx (7)
7-8: LGTM: Import changes align with new features.The addition of the
Alertimport and the reorganization of imports are appropriate for the new error handling feature described in the PR objectives.
10-10: LGTM: useState import added.The addition of
useStateto the import statement is appropriate for the new state variables (hasErroranddisableButton) mentioned in the AI summary.
40-41: LGTM: New state variables for error handling and button control.The addition of
hasErroranddisableButtonstate variables aligns well with the PR objectives. These will help manage error states and prevent multiple submissions, enhancing the user experience.
71-75: LGTM: Proper state reset in useEffect.The addition of
setHasError(false)andsetDisableButton(false)in theuseEffecthook ensures that the error state and button state are properly reset when the dialog is reopened. This is a good practice that enhances the user experience by preventing stale states.
105-105: LGTM: Improved field labeling and button state management.The changes to the "Name" field label and the submit button are good improvements:
- Adding an asterisk to the "Name" label clearly indicates it's a required field, enhancing user understanding.
- The
disabledprop on the submit button, controlled by thedisableButtonstate, successfully implements the locking feature mentioned in the PR objectives. This prevents accidental multiple submissions.These changes contribute to a better user experience and align well with the PR goals.
Also applies to: 132-139
Line range hint
1-144: Overall: Good implementation with room for minor improvements.The changes in this file successfully implement the PR objectives, including:
- Enhanced error handling for endpoint creation failures.
- Implementation of a locking mechanism for the submit button.
- Improved user feedback through error alerts and required field indication.
The code is generally well-structured and aligns with React best practices. However, consider the following suggestions for further improvement:
- Enhance error messages to be more specific and actionable.
- Refactor the
onSubmitFormfunction to simplify error handling and ensure consistent button state management.- Clarify the reason for moving the
StyledDialogTitleinside the form element.These minor adjustments would further enhance the user experience and code maintainability.
85-87: Clarify form structure change and approve style adjustment.The
StyledDialogTitlehas been moved inside the form element. Could you clarify the reason for this structural change? It might affect the layout or styling of the dialog.The style adjustment on
DialogContentis a minor UI improvement and looks good.To verify the impact of moving
StyledDialogTitle, please run:✅ Verification successful
Structure Change Verified and Style Adjustment Approved.
The
StyledDialogTitleis only used inAddLinkDialog.tsxandQRCodeDialog.tsx. Moving it inside the form element inAddLinkDialog.tsxdoes not impact its usage elsewhere.The style adjustment on
DialogContentis a minor UI improvement and looks good.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of StyledDialogTitle to ensure consistency rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'StyledDialogTitle'Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of StyledDialogTitle to ensure consistency rg --type ts --type tsx 'StyledDialogTitle'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of StyledDialogTitle in .ts and .tsx files to ensure consistency rg 'StyledDialogTitle' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'Length of output: 616
yassinedorbozgithub
requested review from
medchedli,
BMartinos and
jacob-khoza-symb
This update includes :