Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Just a test for includes #357

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

HLeithner
Copy link
Member

@HLeithner HLeithner commented Dec 29, 2024

User description

A test to show the usage of includes, used in form fields attributes


PR Type

Documentation


Description

  • Created new reusable documentation component for generic form field attributes (_generic-attributes.md)
  • Implemented documentation includes to maintain consistency across form field documentation
  • Consolidated common form field attributes documentation in a single source
  • Updated accessiblemedia and standard form field documentation to use the new generic attributes component

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Documentation
_generic-attributes.md
New documentation for generic form field attributes           

docs/general-concepts/forms-fields/_generic-attributes.md

  • Created new file with generic form field attributes documentation
  • Defined common attributes like autocomplete, spellcheck, autofocus,
    hidden
  • Added explanation of generic attributes usage and inheritance from
    FormField class
  • +16/-0   
    accessiblemedia.md
    Include generic attributes in accessiblemedia docs             

    docs/general-concepts/forms-fields/standard-fields/accessiblemedia.md

  • Added import statement for generic attributes
  • Included generic attributes documentation in accessiblemedia field
    documentation
  • +3/-0     
    standard-form-field-attributes.md
    Refactor standard form field attributes documentation       

    docs/general-concepts/forms-fields/standard-form-field-attributes.md

  • Added import statement for generic attributes
  • Replaced inline attributes list with imported generic attributes
    content
  • +2/-4     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Typo

    The heading "Gernic Attributes" contains a typo and should be "Generic Attributes"

    ## Gernic Attributes

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    General
    Fix spelling error in section heading to maintain documentation quality

    Fix the typo in the heading "Gernic" to "Generic" to maintain documentation accuracy
    and professionalism.

    docs/general-concepts/forms-fields/_generic-attributes.md [3]

    -## Gernic Attributes
    +## Generic Attributes
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Fixing the typo "Gernic" to "Generic" is important for documentation accuracy and professionalism, as this heading is a key section identifier that could affect readability and searchability.

    8
    Remove unnecessary blank lines at file start to improve document formatting

    Remove the redundant empty lines at the start of the file to maintain clean
    documentation formatting.

    docs/general-concepts/forms-fields/_generic-attributes.md [1-3]

    +## Generic Attributes
     
    -
    -## Gernic Attributes
    -
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3

    Why: While removing extra blank lines would improve formatting consistency, this is a minor cosmetic issue that doesn't affect functionality or readability significantly.

    3

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant