Fix for issue #21118: inconsistent behavior across callbacks

[adar21a]

#21118

[google-cla]

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.69%. Comparing base (6d26efb) to head (acec574).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
keras/src/callbacks/model_checkpoint.py	80.00%	3 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #21124      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.69%   82.69%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         564      564              
  Lines       54132    54152      +20     
  Branches     8411     8420       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        44765    44779      +14     
- Misses       7294     7297       +3     
- Partials     2073     2076       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
keras	82.50% <80.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
keras-jax	64.08% <80.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
keras-numpy	59.08% <8.57%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
keras-openvino	32.87% <8.57%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
keras-tensorflow	64.36% <80.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
keras-torch	64.12% <80.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[gbaned]

Hi @adar21a Can you please sign CLA? Thank you!

[fchollet]

Thanks for the PR! Please add a unit test for the fixed use cases.

[adar21a]

Thanks for the PR! Please add a unit test for the fixed use cases.

Hi @fchollet :) I transitioned this PR to #21275 and I added there the unit test for this fixed case. Let me know if now it's OK.