Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue : https://github.com/kestra-io/kestra/issues/4574 Added a bulk delete option in backend #5949

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yoyounik
Copy link
Contributor

…lk delete option.
I have added the Java Backend code, for bulk deletion.

This is PR to the issue no. : #4574

What changes are being made and why?


How the changes have been QAed?


Setup Instructions

@yoyounik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @Skraye please provide some advice on how to run this.

@yoyounik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hii @MilosPaunovic , please go through the frontend once you get time .

@Skraye
Copy link
Member

Skraye commented Nov 18, 2024

@yoyounik Kestra does not compile

@yoyounik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hii @Skraye now i made the changes, all the check are running , please go through it

@@ -43,6 +44,9 @@ public class LogController {
@Inject
private TenantService tenantService;

@Inject
private LogService a;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not acceptable

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what should i name it then?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yoyounik yoyounik Nov 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

logService named already exist with :
image

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the current logService should be renamed executionLogService, so your logService that use the class LogService can keep his name, so we know which class is used behind the variable name

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: To review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants