Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Add client defaulting and validation for DiscoveryResponse #6578

Conversation

killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: killianmuldoon [email protected]

Adds some basic validation and defaulting rules to the runtime SDK client on Discovery of Extension Handlers.

Part of #6330

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 31, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 31, 2022
@sbueringer sbueringer mentioned this pull request May 31, 2022
30 tasks
internal/runtime/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 1, 2022
Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm pending addressing nits (and squash)

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon force-pushed the runtimeSDK/discovery-validation branch from cf0ed86 to 7f3481d Compare June 8, 2022 17:56
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 8, 2022
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon force-pushed the runtimeSDK/discovery-validation branch from 7f3481d to 2fcbfbb Compare June 8, 2022 17:57
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work!

A few nits, but nothing major

internal/runtime/catalog/catalog.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/runtime/client/client_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2022
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

@killianmuldoon it seems it is required to run make generate

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2022
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
looking forward to approve pending squash

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2022
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon force-pushed the runtimeSDK/discovery-validation branch from 8d95774 to 10bd788 Compare June 9, 2022 09:54
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2022
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thx!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 53f0eca into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.2 milestone Jun 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants