-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
KEP-3695: Add updates around e2e tests #5430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -265,6 +265,12 @@ These cases will be added in the existing e2e tests: | |
- Get API work with DRA and device plugin. | ||
- List API work with DRA and Device plugin. | ||
|
||
[Get](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/116846): [sig-node-kubelet](https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-node-kubelet?include-filter-by-regex=PodResources), [triage](https://storage.googleapis.com/k8s-triage/index.html?test=PodResources) | ||
|
||
Other improvements are addressed in: | ||
- https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/132028 | ||
- https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/132345 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Those are fine, since those are no-merged PRs, so when updating this the next time you'll be able to replace these with appropriate links and descriptions like above. |
||
|
||
Comment on lines
+270
to
+273
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think, but please doublecheck, is better not to link PRs in the KEP but rather describe the goal these PR implement.
So I'd just remove lines 270-272 |
||
### Graduation Criteria | ||
|
||
#### Alpha | ||
|
@@ -282,6 +288,13 @@ These cases will be added in the existing e2e tests: | |
|
||
- [ ] Allowing time for feedback (1 year). | ||
- [ ] Risks have been addressed. | ||
- [ ] Add explicit feature enablement/disablement tests, before the feature is turned on by default. | ||
- [ ] Additional test cases are needed to verify Get() behavior in diverse scenarios | ||
- Pods with multiple containers. | ||
- Pods that do not use any exclusive resources. | ||
- Comparison of List() and Get() on returned pods to validate consistency. | ||
- Pod exists but container name is invalid | ||
- Get() is called on terminated pods to validate appropriate error handling. | ||
|
||
### Upgrade / Downgrade Strategy | ||
|
||
|
@@ -334,7 +347,9 @@ The API becomes available again. The API is stateless, so no recovery is needed, | |
|
||
###### Are there any tests for feature enablement/disablement? | ||
|
||
e2e test will demonstrate that when the feature gate is disabled, the API returns the appropriate error code. (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/116846) | ||
This e2e test (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/116846) will demonstrate that when the feature gate is disabled, the API returns the appropriate error code. The explicit on/off tests are scattered across the existing tests: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Again, replace the PR link with code pointers to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e_node/podresources_test.go |
||
- https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.34.0-alpha.1/test/e2e_node/podresources_test.go#L977 | ||
- https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.34.0-alpha.1/test/e2e_node/podresources_test.go#L1066 | ||
Comment on lines
+350
to
+352
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ...and we should rectify that and have this test clear and explicit |
||
|
||
### Rollout, Upgrade and Rollback Planning | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR link should be replaced with actual code links to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e_node/podresources_test.go