Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Align set with k/k apimachinery #294

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Align set with k/k apimachinery #294

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

skitt
Copy link
Member

@skitt skitt commented Nov 23, 2023

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

This aligns the features of generic Set with the version in apimachinery. The main change is that sets can be instantiated with any comparable type, not only ordered types; as a result, SortedList() can no longer be implemented as a method, and is replaced by the List() function to match apimachinery.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

sets.Set accepts any comparable type; the sets.SortedList method is replaced with a sets.List function, to match the apimachinery implementation, and to allow unordered sets to be converted to ordered slices.

@skitt
Align set with k/k apimachinery
93a9af8 
This aligns the features of generic Set with the version in
apimachinery. The main change is that sets can be instantiated with
any comparable type, not only ordered types; as a result, SortedList()
can no longer be implemented as a method, and is replaced by the
List() function to match apimachinery.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 23, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 23, 2023
logicalhan
logicalhan approved these changes Nov 23, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@logicalhan logicalhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 23, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: logicalhan, skitt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 23, 2023
@skitt
Copy link
Member Author

skitt commented Nov 23, 2023

Thanks @logicalhan! There’s a failure in apidiff but I don’t think it’s significant — the changes are expected (or bugs in apidiff).

@logicalhan
Copy link
Member

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 23, 2023
@logicalhan
Copy link
Member

Thanks @logicalhan! There’s a failure in apidiff but I don’t think it’s significant — the changes are expected (or bugs in apidiff).

It is significant because we don't know who's using this.

@skitt
Copy link
Member Author

skitt commented Nov 23, 2023

It is significant because we don't know who's using this.

The changes are listed as follows:

- KeySet: changed from func(map[E]A) Set[E] to func(map[E]A) Set[E]
- New: changed from func(...E) Set[E] to func(...E) Set[E]
- Set: changed from Set[E ordered] to Set[E comparable]

The first two aren’t changes. The last one is fine because comparable is a superset of ordered, so any existing Set will still build.

@wallrj wallrj mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2024
Merged
2 tasks
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 21, 2024
@skitt
Copy link
Member Author

skitt commented Feb 21, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 21, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 21, 2024
@skitt
Copy link
Member Author

skitt commented May 22, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 22, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 20, 2024
@skitt
Copy link
Member Author

skitt commented Aug 20, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 20, 2024
@skitt skitt mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2024
Open
4 tasks
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 18, 2024
@skitt
Copy link
Member Author

skitt commented Nov 19, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@logicalhan logicalhan logicalhan approved these changes

@thockin thockin Awaiting requested review from thockin

Assignees

@logicalhan logicalhan

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@skitt @k8s-ci-robot @logicalhan @k8s-triage-robot