-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 365
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat(FieldTheory/PurelyInseparable): definition and basic results of purely inseparable extensions #9488
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the reviewing process will be faster if you can split everything except the new file into a new PR.
OK, will do it later. |
99637a3
to
463e1ec
Compare
I also have this /-- If `E` is a perfect field of characteristic `p`, then the (relative) perfect closure
`perfectClosure F E` is perfect. -/
instance perfectClosure.perfectRing (p : ℕ) [ExpChar F p] [ExpChar E p]
[PerfectRing E p] : PerfectRing (perfectClosure F E) p := .ofSurjective _ p fun x ↦ by but maybe let's leave it for next PR? |
As you like! |
|
||
variable (E) | ||
|
||
-- TODO: remove `halg` assumption |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What are we missing for this TODO?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need some result that for a transcendental extension E / F
, the finSepDegree
cannot be one, namely, there are at least two F
-embeddings from E
to the algebraic closure of E
. Maybe @alreadydone has some preliminary works on it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's keep this for another PR, has this one is already pretty long.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mainly we need a version of IsTranscendenceBasis.isAlgebraic with IntermediateField.adjoin rather than Algebra.adjoin, and we need to construct different embeddings of these IntermediateField.adjoin (which are purely transcendental extensions, and for this purpose IsTranscendenceBasis can be relaxed to AlgebraicIndependent).
If we want to count the number of embeddings, even more work need to be done.
All these would better be done in another PR touching RingTheory/AlgebraicIndependent.
Co-authored-by: Riccardo Brasca <[email protected]>
Thanks! bors d+ |
✌️ acmepjz can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
bors r+ |
…purely inseparable extensions (#9488) Main defintions: - `IsPurelyInseparable`: typeclass for purely inseparable field extension: an algebraic extension `E / F` is purely inseparable if and only if the minimal polynomial of every element of `E ∖ F` is not separable. Main results (not exhaustive): - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_mem_pow`: a field extension `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, there exists a natural number `n` such that `x ^ (q ^ n)` is contained in `F`. - `IsPurelyInseparable.trans`: if `E / F` and `K / E` are both purely inseparable extensions, then `K / F` is also purely inseparable. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_natSepDegree_eq_one`: `E / F` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, its minimal polynomial has separable degree one. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_minpoly_eq_X_pow_sub_C`: a field extension `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, the minimal polynomial of `x` over `F` is of form `X ^ (q ^ n) - y` for some natural number `n` and some element `y` of `F`. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_minpoly_eq_X_sub_C_pow`: a field extension `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, the minimal polynomial of `x` over `F` is of form `(X - x) ^ (q ^ n)` for some natural number `n`. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_finSepDegree_eq_one`: an algebraic extension is purely inseparable if and only if it has (finite) separable degree one. **TODO:** remove the algebraic assumption. (will be in later PR) - `IsPurelyInseparable.normal`: a purely inseparable extension is normal. - `separableClosure.isPurelyInseparable`: if `E / F` is algebraic, then `E` is purely inseparable over the (relative) separable closure of `E / F`. - `IsPurelyInseparable.injective_comp_algebraMap`: if `E / F` is purely inseparable, then for any reduced ring `L`, the map `(E →+* L) → (F →+* L)` induced by `algebraMap F E` is injective. In other words, a purely inseparable field extension is an epimorphism in the category of fields. - `isPurelyInseparable_adjoin_iff_mem_pow`: if `F` is of exponential characteristic `q`, then `F(S) / F` is a purely inseparable extension if and only if for any `x ∈ S`, `x ^ (q ^ n)` is contained in `F` for some `n : ℕ`. - `Field.finSepDegree_eq`: if `E / F` is algebraic, then the `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to `Field.sepDegree F E` as a natural number. This means that the cardinality of `Field.Emb F E` and the degree of `(separableClosure F E) / F` are both finite or infinite, and when they are finite, they coincide. TODO: (will be in later PR) - `IsPurelyInseparable.of_injective_comp_algebraMap`: if `L` is an algebraically closed field containing `E`, such that the map `(E →+* L) → (F →+* L)` induced by `algebraMap F E` is injective, then `E / F` is purely inseparable. In other words, epimorphisms in the category of fields must be purely inseparable extensions. Need to use the fact that `Emb F E` is infintie when `E / F` is (purely) transcendental. - Prove that the (infinite) inseparable degree are multiplicative; linearly disjoint argument is needed. Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <[email protected]>
Build failed (retrying...): |
Canceled. |
· rw [pow_mul', h, one_pow] | ||
rw [pow_mul'] | ||
convert ← (iterateFrobenius_inj R p k).eq_iff | ||
apply map_one |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@riccardobrasca I moved one new lemma and two golfs from #9311 to this PR to streamline this proof below.
bors r+ |
…purely inseparable extensions (#9488) Main defintions: - `IsPurelyInseparable`: typeclass for purely inseparable field extension: an algebraic extension `E / F` is purely inseparable if and only if the minimal polynomial of every element of `E ∖ F` is not separable. Main results (not exhaustive): - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_mem_pow`: a field extension `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, there exists a natural number `n` such that `x ^ (q ^ n)` is contained in `F`. - `IsPurelyInseparable.trans`: if `E / F` and `K / E` are both purely inseparable extensions, then `K / F` is also purely inseparable. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_natSepDegree_eq_one`: `E / F` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, its minimal polynomial has separable degree one. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_minpoly_eq_X_pow_sub_C`: a field extension `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, the minimal polynomial of `x` over `F` is of form `X ^ (q ^ n) - y` for some natural number `n` and some element `y` of `F`. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_minpoly_eq_X_sub_C_pow`: a field extension `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, the minimal polynomial of `x` over `F` is of form `(X - x) ^ (q ^ n)` for some natural number `n`. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_finSepDegree_eq_one`: an algebraic extension is purely inseparable if and only if it has (finite) separable degree one. **TODO:** remove the algebraic assumption. (will be in later PR) - `IsPurelyInseparable.normal`: a purely inseparable extension is normal. - `separableClosure.isPurelyInseparable`: if `E / F` is algebraic, then `E` is purely inseparable over the (relative) separable closure of `E / F`. - `IsPurelyInseparable.injective_comp_algebraMap`: if `E / F` is purely inseparable, then for any reduced ring `L`, the map `(E →+* L) → (F →+* L)` induced by `algebraMap F E` is injective. In other words, a purely inseparable field extension is an epimorphism in the category of fields. - `isPurelyInseparable_adjoin_iff_mem_pow`: if `F` is of exponential characteristic `q`, then `F(S) / F` is a purely inseparable extension if and only if for any `x ∈ S`, `x ^ (q ^ n)` is contained in `F` for some `n : ℕ`. - `Field.finSepDegree_eq`: if `E / F` is algebraic, then the `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to `Field.sepDegree F E` as a natural number. This means that the cardinality of `Field.Emb F E` and the degree of `(separableClosure F E) / F` are both finite or infinite, and when they are finite, they coincide. TODO: (will be in later PR) - `IsPurelyInseparable.of_injective_comp_algebraMap`: if `L` is an algebraically closed field containing `E`, such that the map `(E →+* L) → (F →+* L)` induced by `algebraMap F E` is injective, then `E / F` is purely inseparable. In other words, epimorphisms in the category of fields must be purely inseparable extensions. Need to use the fact that `Emb F E` is infintie when `E / F` is (purely) transcendental. - Prove that the (infinite) inseparable degree are multiplicative; linearly disjoint argument is needed. Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <[email protected]>
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
Change the expression "separable closure of `E / F`" to "separable closure of `F` in `E`", which IMO is closer to everyday usage. I think we should do the same for "perfect closure" in #9488. Also remove the use of some parenthesized adjectives: IMO "(some adjective)" signifies that "some adjective" will be assumed to be the default in subsequent text, making it unnecessary to mention "some adjective" every time. This applies to "(relative)" and "(infinite)" in the file SeparableClosure. Writing both "(infinite)" and "(finite)" signifies that both are assumed to be default, which is not our intention (I think we intend to make "infinite" the default). Therefore I kept the first "(infinite)" and removed all subsequent "(infinite)" and parentheses around "finite". In the file SeparableDegree, the infinite separable degree is not yet defined, so "finite" is the default instead: indeed the file omits "finite" almost everywhere, so I just remove the remaining three occurrences of "(finite)". Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: acmepjz <[email protected]>
…purely inseparable extensions (#9488) Main defintions: - `IsPurelyInseparable`: typeclass for purely inseparable field extension: an algebraic extension `E / F` is purely inseparable if and only if the minimal polynomial of every element of `E ∖ F` is not separable. Main results (not exhaustive): - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_mem_pow`: a field extension `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, there exists a natural number `n` such that `x ^ (q ^ n)` is contained in `F`. - `IsPurelyInseparable.trans`: if `E / F` and `K / E` are both purely inseparable extensions, then `K / F` is also purely inseparable. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_natSepDegree_eq_one`: `E / F` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, its minimal polynomial has separable degree one. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_minpoly_eq_X_pow_sub_C`: a field extension `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, the minimal polynomial of `x` over `F` is of form `X ^ (q ^ n) - y` for some natural number `n` and some element `y` of `F`. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_minpoly_eq_X_sub_C_pow`: a field extension `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` is purely inseparable if and only if for every element `x` of `E`, the minimal polynomial of `x` over `F` is of form `(X - x) ^ (q ^ n)` for some natural number `n`. - `isPurelyInseparable_iff_finSepDegree_eq_one`: an algebraic extension is purely inseparable if and only if it has (finite) separable degree one. **TODO:** remove the algebraic assumption. (will be in later PR) - `IsPurelyInseparable.normal`: a purely inseparable extension is normal. - `separableClosure.isPurelyInseparable`: if `E / F` is algebraic, then `E` is purely inseparable over the (relative) separable closure of `E / F`. - `IsPurelyInseparable.injective_comp_algebraMap`: if `E / F` is purely inseparable, then for any reduced ring `L`, the map `(E →+* L) → (F →+* L)` induced by `algebraMap F E` is injective. In other words, a purely inseparable field extension is an epimorphism in the category of fields. - `isPurelyInseparable_adjoin_iff_mem_pow`: if `F` is of exponential characteristic `q`, then `F(S) / F` is a purely inseparable extension if and only if for any `x ∈ S`, `x ^ (q ^ n)` is contained in `F` for some `n : ℕ`. - `Field.finSepDegree_eq`: if `E / F` is algebraic, then the `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to `Field.sepDegree F E` as a natural number. This means that the cardinality of `Field.Emb F E` and the degree of `(separableClosure F E) / F` are both finite or infinite, and when they are finite, they coincide. TODO: (will be in later PR) - `IsPurelyInseparable.of_injective_comp_algebraMap`: if `L` is an algebraically closed field containing `E`, such that the map `(E →+* L) → (F →+* L)` induced by `algebraMap F E` is injective, then `E / F` is purely inseparable. In other words, epimorphisms in the category of fields must be purely inseparable extensions. Need to use the fact that `Emb F E` is infintie when `E / F` is (purely) transcendental. - Prove that the (infinite) inseparable degree are multiplicative; linearly disjoint argument is needed. Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <[email protected]>
Change the expression "separable closure of `E / F`" to "separable closure of `F` in `E`", which IMO is closer to everyday usage. I think we should do the same for "perfect closure" in #9488. Also remove the use of some parenthesized adjectives: IMO "(some adjective)" signifies that "some adjective" will be assumed to be the default in subsequent text, making it unnecessary to mention "some adjective" every time. This applies to "(relative)" and "(infinite)" in the file SeparableClosure. Writing both "(infinite)" and "(finite)" signifies that both are assumed to be default, which is not our intention (I think we intend to make "infinite" the default). Therefore I kept the first "(infinite)" and removed all subsequent "(infinite)" and parentheses around "finite". In the file SeparableDegree, the infinite separable degree is not yet defined, so "finite" is the default instead: indeed the file omits "finite" almost everywhere, so I just remove the remaining three occurrences of "(finite)". Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: acmepjz <[email protected]>
Change the expression "separable closure of `E / F`" to "separable closure of `F` in `E`", which IMO is closer to everyday usage. I think we should do the same for "perfect closure" in #9488. Also remove the use of some parenthesized adjectives: IMO "(some adjective)" signifies that "some adjective" will be assumed to be the default in subsequent text, making it unnecessary to mention "some adjective" every time. This applies to "(relative)" and "(infinite)" in the file SeparableClosure. Writing both "(infinite)" and "(finite)" signifies that both are assumed to be default, which is not our intention (I think we intend to make "infinite" the default). Therefore I kept the first "(infinite)" and removed all subsequent "(infinite)" and parentheses around "finite". In the file SeparableDegree, the infinite separable degree is not yet defined, so "finite" is the default instead: indeed the file omits "finite" almost everywhere, so I just remove the remaining three occurrences of "(finite)". Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: acmepjz <[email protected]>
Main defintions:
IsPurelyInseparable
: typeclass for purely inseparable field extension: an algebraic extensionE / F
is purely inseparable if and only if the minimal polynomial of every element ofE ∖ F
is not separable.
Main results (not exhaustive):
isPurelyInseparable_iff_mem_pow
: a field extensionE / F
of exponential characteristicq
ispurely inseparable if and only if for every element
x
ofE
, there exists a natural numbern
such that
x ^ (q ^ n)
is contained inF
.IsPurelyInseparable.trans
: ifE / F
andK / E
are both purely inseparable extensions, thenK / F
is also purely inseparable.isPurelyInseparable_iff_natSepDegree_eq_one
:E / F
is purely inseparable if and only if forevery element
x
ofE
, its minimal polynomial has separable degree one.isPurelyInseparable_iff_minpoly_eq_X_pow_sub_C
: a field extensionE / F
of exponentialcharacteristic
q
is purely inseparable if and only if for every elementx
ofE
, the minimalpolynomial of
x
overF
is of formX ^ (q ^ n) - y
for some natural numbern
and someelement
y
ofF
.isPurelyInseparable_iff_minpoly_eq_X_sub_C_pow
: a field extensionE / F
of exponentialcharacteristic
q
is purely inseparable if and only if for every elementx
ofE
, the minimalpolynomial of
x
overF
is of form(X - x) ^ (q ^ n)
for some natural numbern
.isPurelyInseparable_iff_finSepDegree_eq_one
: an algebraic extension is purely inseparableif and only if it has (finite) separable degree one.
TODO: remove the algebraic assumption. (will be in later PR)
IsPurelyInseparable.normal
: a purely inseparable extension is normal.separableClosure.isPurelyInseparable
: ifE / F
is algebraic, thenE
is purely inseparableover the (relative) separable closure of
E / F
.IsPurelyInseparable.injective_comp_algebraMap
: ifE / F
is purely inseparable, then for anyreduced ring
L
, the map(E →+* L) → (F →+* L)
induced byalgebraMap F E
is injective.In other words, a purely inseparable field extension is an epimorphism in the category of fields.
isPurelyInseparable_adjoin_iff_mem_pow
: ifF
is of exponential characteristicq
, thenF(S) / F
is a purely inseparable extension if and only if for anyx ∈ S
,x ^ (q ^ n)
iscontained in
F
for somen : ℕ
.Field.finSepDegree_eq
: ifE / F
is algebraic, then theField.finSepDegree F E
is equal toField.sepDegree F E
as a natural number. This means that the cardinality ofField.Emb F E
and the degree of
(separableClosure F E) / F
are both finite or infinite, and when they arefinite, they coincide.
TODO: (will be in later PR)
IsPurelyInseparable.of_injective_comp_algebraMap
: ifL
is an algebraically closed fieldcontaining
E
, such that the map(E →+* L) → (F →+* L)
induced byalgebraMap F E
isinjective, then
E / F
is purely inseparable. In other words, epimorphisms in the category offields must be purely inseparable extensions. Need to use the fact that
Emb F E
is infintiewhen
E / F
is (purely) transcendental.Prove that the (infinite) inseparable degree are multiplicative; linearly disjoint argument is needed.
exists_finset_of_mem_adjoin
#9524Separable.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree
and golf #9525ExpChar
parallel toCharP
#9573equivMap[OfInjective]
for subalgebra and intermediate field #9709IsAlgClosed.perfectField
instance #9710linearIndependent_iff_finset_linearIndependent
#9797sum_pow_{char|expChar}_pow
#9799CharP+Prime
toExpChar
infrobenius
#10016Submodule.image_span_subset(_span)
and golf #10017