-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 449
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: indent nested traces correctly #6345
Conversation
Presumably this worked before due to extra `.group` nodes appearing. I think `group`s should be implied by the children of a trace node. Not tested as I do not have a working setup for the latest Lean, though there is a test case at https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/trace.20nodes.20do.20not.20nest.20correctly.20in.20the.20infoview/near/487028252.
Mathlib CI status (docs):
|
I have been wondering if it’s just me that the nested traces looked less useful than they could, but maybe it was indeed just broken and needed a simple fix! Any chance of a test case that covers that? Can |
is enough to reproduce the issue, but |
Maybe the issue is actually at lean4/src/Lean/Widget/InteractiveDiagnostic.lean Lines 210 to 215 in ffac974
and my patch is garbage. |
Closing in favor of #6389, this patch doesn't help. |
Inspired by hacking done with @robertylewis and @hrmacbeth which resulted in #19771. The effect is that the traces messages are now hierarchical; though it's easy not to notice in VSCode without a better version of leanprover/lean4#6345. See https://profiler.firefox.com/public/smkc5ffh9318w177gps2x9e5b6wy117s6f18e6g/flame-graph/?globalTrackOrder=0&thread=0&transforms=ff-2659&v=10 for an example output produced with ```bash lake lean MathlibTest/linarith.lean -- \ -Dtrace.profiler=true \ -Dtrace.profiler.threshold=1 \ -Dtrace.profiler.output.pp=true \ -Dtrace.profiler.output=linarith-profile.json ``` Some inconclusive discussion about best practices for `withTraceNode` is [on Zulip here](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/Using.20withTraceNode/near/489198580). Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <[email protected]>
Presumably this worked before due to extra
.group
nodes appearing. I thinkgroup
s should be implied by the children of a trace node.Not tested as I do not have a working setup for the latest Lean, though there is a test case at https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/trace.20nodes.20do.20not.20nest.20correctly.20in.20the.20infoview/near/487028252.
Read this section before submitting
missing documentation
ormissing tests
then it needs fixing!RFC
orbug
issue in the description.feat/fix
PRs, the first paragraph starting with "This PR" must be present and will become achangelog entry unless the PR is labeled with
no-changelog
. If the PR does not have this label,it must instead be categorized with one of the
changelog-*
labels (which will be done by areviewer for external PRs).
leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
for Linux and M-series Macs will be generated upon build. To generate binaries for Windows and Intel-based Macs as well, write a comment containingrelease-ci
on its own line.nightly-with-mathlib
then CI will test Mathlib against your PR.awaiting-review
,awaiting-author
, andWIP
labels yourself, by writing a comment containing one of these labels on its own line.---
before submitting.This PR <short changelog summary for feat/fix, see above>.
Closes <
RFC
orbug
issue number fixed by this PR, if any>