You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I mapped whole genome sequencing data using the -a option. Some alignments have a Flag total of 377 and 441. According to Explain SAM Flags internet tool, 377 includes mate unmapped, read reverse strand, mate reverse strand. How could the mate be unmapped, but also on the reverse strand? Similarly, 441 has the same issue of being contradictory. I came across this by chance because I was trying to decide what value to provide to samtools view -f to explore all of the alignments added by the -a option of bwa mem. It could be more explicitly documented, similar to #206 request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have paired reads where one has a SAM flag total of 117 and the other has a value of 185. In both cases, these values indicate that the unmapped read is associated with the reverse strand.
The alignment were bwa mem PE alignments with -M flag.
I mapped whole genome sequencing data using the
-a
option. Some alignments have a Flag total of 377 and 441. According to Explain SAM Flags internet tool, 377 includes mate unmapped, read reverse strand, mate reverse strand. How could the mate be unmapped, but also on the reverse strand? Similarly, 441 has the same issue of being contradictory. I came across this by chance because I was trying to decide what value to provide tosamtools view -f
to explore all of the alignments added by the-a
option ofbwa mem
. It could be more explicitly documented, similar to #206 request.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: