Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf Configurable for itest #9562

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NishantBansal2003
Copy link
Contributor

Change Description

Fixes: #9511
This PR introduces a configurable parameter for the constant MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf used in funding manager. The change allows developers and integration environments to override the default value (2016 blocks) via a build tag, enabling the mining of fewer blocks to trigger timeout scenarios during testing. In production builds, the default value remains unchanged to ensure stability.

Key Changes:

  • Configurable Timeout Constant:
    • Added MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf to DevConfig so that its value can be modified.
  • Production Safety:
    • Retains the default value of 2016 blocks for production, ensuring no impact on production behavior.
  • Improved Testing Flexibility:
    • Allows tests to simulate timeout conditions more efficiently by reducing the number of blocks that need to be mined during integration testing.

Steps to Test

  • Added itest to confirm that timeout conditions are triggered as expected with the modified constant.

Pull Request Checklist

Testing

  • Your PR passes all CI checks.
  • Tests covering the positive and negative (error paths) are included.
  • Bug fixes contain tests triggering the bug to prevent regressions.

Code Style and Documentation

📝 Please see our Contribution Guidelines for further guidance.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Crypt-iQ Crypt-iQ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did a quick pass: needs proper formatting, lines go to 80 chars. I think the style guide in the repo can help you fix most of these issues. Otherwise, the core change looks good

// For the maxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf different values are set
// in case we are in a dev environment so enhance test
// capabilities.
maxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf := MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

variable name should not be reused, a bit confusing

// MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf is the maximum number of blocks
// to wait for the funding transaction to be confirmed before forgetting
// channels that aren't initiated by us.
MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf int
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: can we uint32 this so we don't need the cast below? fine if not

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can do that, but in that case, I need to update const MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf = 2016 to const MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf uint32 = 2016. However, I'm not sure if this might cause any compatibility issues.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not a big deal, just a nit so feel free to leave as-is

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Constants don't have a type, if you don't explicitly set one. So it can be determined at compile time. So you can easily make this uint32 and then below just do: var waitBlocksForFundingConf uint32 = MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf.

// Get the maxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf. If we are not in
// development mode, this would be nil.
if lncfg.IsDevBuild() {
maxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf = f.cfg.Dev.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: one line

@NishantBansal2003
Copy link
Contributor Author

needs proper formatting, lines go to 80 chars.

Hey @Crypt-iQ, I checked my code and believe I've already adhered to the 80-character limit. Could you let me know where the issue might be? (In some cases, more than 80 characters is necessary—such as in description) Also, should I add release notes for 0.19.0?

@guggero
Copy link
Collaborator

guggero commented Feb 28, 2025

needs proper formatting, lines go to 80 chars.

Hey @Crypt-iQ, I checked my code and believe I've already adhered to the 80-character limit. Could you let me know where the issue might be? (In some cases, more than 80 characters is necessary—such as in description) Also, should I add release notes for 0.19.0?

You need to configure your IDE to use 8 chars for the tab character, otherwise the 80 character limit is hard to adhere to.
Yes, you can add 0.19 release notes.

@@ -339,6 +340,11 @@ type DevConfig struct {
// remote node's channel ready message once the channel as been marked
// as `channelReadySent`.
ProcessChannelReadyWait time.Duration

// MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf is the maximum number of blocks
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For example, here the comment can go up to 80 characters but then you wrap-around

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, it's fixed. PTAL.

@saubyk saubyk added this to the v0.19.0 milestone Feb 28, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@guggero guggero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR.

// MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf is the maximum number of blocks
// to wait for the funding transaction to be confirmed before forgetting
// channels that aren't initiated by us.
MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf int
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Constants don't have a type, if you don't explicitly set one. So it can be determined at compile time. So you can easily make this uint32 and then below just do: var waitBlocksForFundingConf uint32 = MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf.

waitBlocksForFundingConf := MaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf

// Get the waitBlocksForFundingConf. If we are not in development mode,
// this would be nil.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The default value of an int type is actually 0, not nil.

Comment on lines 994 to 998
ht.OpenChannelAssertPending(alice, bob,
lntest.OpenChannelParams{
Amt: 500000,
PushAmt: 0,
})
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: inconsistent formatting. Should either be:

	ht.OpenChannelAssertPending(alice, bob, lntest.OpenChannelParams{
		Amt:     500000,
		PushAmt: 0,
	})

or

	ht.OpenChannelAssertPending(
		alice, bob, lntest.OpenChannelParams{
			Amt:     500000,
			PushAmt: 0,
		},
	)

depending on what fits with the line length limit.

// DefaultMaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf is the maximum number of blocks to
// wait for the funding transaction to confirm before forgetting
// channels that aren't initiated by us. 2016 blocks is ~2 weeks.
DefaultMaxWaitNumBlocksFundingConf = 2016
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this defined twice now? I think we should just use this value everywhere now and remove the one in funding. Unless that will cause a circular package dependency, in which case we need to find a good place for it.

This commit adds an integration test that
verifies the funding timeout behavior in the
funding manager, in dev/integration test.
Signed-off-by: Nishant Bansal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nishant Bansal <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[itest]: missing itest for funding timeout case of 2016 blocks
4 participants