Skip to content

Add dictionary c data integration tests #451

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

Alex-PLACET
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET self-assigned this Jun 16, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.31%. Comparing base (54b4ebf) to head (cf713a2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #451   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.31%   88.31%           
=======================================
  Files          96       96           
  Lines        7314     7314           
=======================================
  Hits         6459     6459           
  Misses        855      855           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 88.31% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET requested a review from JohanMabille June 16, 2025 12:51
@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2025 12:51
// );
// }
// }
// }
Copy link
Collaborator

@JohanMabille JohanMabille Jun 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why commenting this?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have to remove it, but the thing is that the dictionary name produced by the C++ implementation doesn't follow the other layout and it's a pain to compare

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you don't plan to reintroduce it (or reimplement it somehow) this code can be deleted for good.

@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ namespace sparrow::c_data_integration
std::vector<sparrow::array>
get_children_arrays(const nlohmann::json& array, const nlohmann::json& schema, const nlohmann::json& root);

void read_schema_from_json(const nlohmann::json& data);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why dropping this one?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was unused and useless

@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET force-pushed the add_dictionary_c_data_integration_tests branch from f2a5849 to 5d78a0d Compare June 23, 2025 07:05
Copy link
Collaborator

@JohanMabille JohanMabille left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, the commented code can be removed to keep the code base "clean".

@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET merged commit 90b1208 into man-group:main Jun 23, 2025
117 of 118 checks passed
@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET deleted the add_dictionary_c_data_integration_tests branch June 23, 2025 09:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants