feat: todo.rs example and some fixes

[marc2332]

NVIDIA_Overlay_EHVakbLMjV.mp4

• DragZone will only dragging for the left mouse button
• more conservative compositor caching area inflation
• Made the Popup be global positioned
• Fixed that that the global position was not using the position_top and the other position attributes

[github-actions]

Benchmark for 07010cd

Click to view benchmark

Test	Base	PR	%
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached	114.2±0.56ms	112.8±0.30ms	-1.23%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached	26.4±1.00ms	25.2±0.66ms	-4.55%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached	1474.7±22.11µs	1473.4±13.46µs	-0.09%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached	138.6±1.34µs	138.6±1.46µs	0.00%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached	26.7±0.91ms	24.1±0.46ms	-9.74%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached	1788.1±45.37µs	1761.8±39.04µs	-1.47%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached	343.7±10.89µs	311.0±6.80µs	-9.51%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached	3.0±0.14ms	2.8±0.02ms	-6.67%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached	431.2±62.22µs	431.7±126.10µs	+0.12%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached	326.9±64.20µs	242.3±5.84µs	-25.88%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached	7.3±0.41ms	6.7±0.03ms	-8.22%

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 87.14286% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.89%. Comparing base (8d0dd30) to head (453d8cd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/torin/src/values/position.rs	78.37%	8 Missing ⚠️
crates/components/src/drag_drop.rs	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1108      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.89%   74.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         231      231              
  Lines       28416    28423       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits        21282    21287       +5     
- Misses       7134     7136       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark for b890d33

Click to view benchmark

Test	Base	PR	%
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached	112.5±1.75ms	113.5±0.74ms	+0.89%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached	27.4±0.94ms	26.9±1.21ms	-1.82%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached	1470.4±10.05µs	1477.3±12.95µs	+0.47%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached	139.4±6.34µs	140.1±6.05µs	+0.50%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached	26.2±0.72ms	25.6±0.37ms	-2.29%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached	1786.2±21.10µs	1773.9±8.38µs	-0.69%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached	314.1±6.66µs	317.4±10.28µs	+1.05%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached	2.8±0.07ms	2.8±0.02ms	0.00%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached	430.8±55.24µs	434.8±95.82µs	+0.93%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached	269.2±160.65µs	259.9±24.57µs	-3.45%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached	6.8±0.27ms	6.8±0.19ms	0.00%

[github-actions]

Benchmark for 6accbec

Click to view benchmark

Test	Base	PR	%
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached	113.6±1.58ms	113.7±0.93ms	+0.09%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached	27.7±0.61ms	27.9±1.26ms	+0.72%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached	1495.2±16.43µs	1505.4±17.46µs	+0.68%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached	142.6±1.90µs	142.4±5.09µs	-0.14%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached	25.7±0.37ms	26.5±0.53ms	+3.11%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached	1843.5±94.84µs	1801.8±22.08µs	-2.26%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached	319.7±6.74µs	316.9±10.23µs	-0.88%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached	3.0±0.03ms	2.8±0.02ms	-6.67%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached	439.0±68.22µs	437.2±33.81µs	-0.41%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached	261.1±17.46µs	261.9±21.32µs	+0.31%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached	6.9±0.10ms	6.8±0.11ms	-1.45%

[github-actions]

Benchmark for 518e912

Click to view benchmark

Test	Base	PR	%
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached	115.2±2.97ms	114.9±2.65ms	-0.26%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached	27.6±0.79ms	27.8±1.22ms	+0.72%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached	1518.1±93.29µs	1513.2±19.40µs	-0.32%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached	141.6±1.50µs	142.5±2.31µs	+0.64%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached	25.9±0.88ms	25.8±0.37ms	-0.39%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached	1842.6±111.45µs	1837.3±37.62µs	-0.29%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached	329.4±14.19µs	318.0±6.36µs	-3.46%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached	3.0±0.03ms	2.9±0.03ms	-3.33%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached	442.7±100.43µs	443.3±49.03µs	+0.14%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached	256.4±27.19µs	259.9±29.02µs	+1.37%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached	6.9±0.12ms	6.9±0.16ms	0.00%