-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 269
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for the shared history flag defined in MSC3061 #4700
Open
poljar
wants to merge
6
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
poljar/shared_history_flag
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… a helper function
…access in some places In several places, we access almost all the fields of a struct to create an `InboundGroupSession` from a pure data struct. When new fields are added to these data structs, it's easy to overlook updating the `InboundGroupSession` accordingly. By using struct destructuring, we ensure that newly added fields are explicitly considered, making it harder to forget one of the newly added fields.
fc77217
to
b0918eb
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4700 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.90% 85.96% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 292 292
Lines 33907 33940 +33
==========================================
+ Hits 29127 29176 +49
+ Misses 4780 4764 -16 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This patch adds support for the `shared_history` flag from MSC3061 to the `m.room_key` content, exported room keys, and backed-up room keys. The flag is now persisted in our `InboundGroupSession`. Additionally, when creating a new `InboundGroupSession`, we ensure the `shared_history` flag is set appropriately. MSC3061: matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#3061
…elves crate a session
b0918eb
to
c4c6c6b
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the first PR in many for the "Encrypted history sharing" feature.
This specific PR tackles element-hq/element-meta#2720.
There are a couple of commits preparing the introduction of the
shared_history
flag but the meat of the PR is contained in 97a7705. The latter commits add a bunch of tests ensuring that the flag is correctly handled in all the various scenarios where we receive or send a room key.Thus a review commit by commit is advised.
One final note, the main constructor for
InboundGroupSession
now has too many arguments, but I'd like to get rid of that constructor or at least make it private. In many (or perhaps all?) cases this constructor is used to create anInboundGroupSession
for testing purposes. I think that theAccount::create_group_session_pair()
method is better suited for this purpose.