Skip to content

Add support for exporting to UCIS #46

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mciepluc
Copy link
Owner

I would like to start working on UCIS based on what @cmarqu has done

@rbarzic
Copy link

rbarzic commented Oct 27, 2021

Any chance to see this pull request being merged ?

@cmarqu
Copy link
Contributor

cmarqu commented Oct 27, 2021

As far as I remember, this code is still unfinished and most likely not usable yet.

@rbarzic
Copy link

rbarzic commented Oct 28, 2021

I tried the code and it generates a database that could be loaded as an HTML page using the FC4SC project. But merging two databases using FC4SC utility didn't work

@mciepluc
Copy link
Owner Author

Hi @rbarzic
I wanted to work on this feature but discovered that UCIS is still not correctly supported by simulator(s) (at least I was not able to do it using Cadence Xcelium). After chat with Cadence Support it appeared that full UCIS usage within Xcelium (meaning merging, converting) requires some additional/extended license. Honestly speaking, I found it so dissapointing that I lost all the enthusiasm for this work. For me the expected goal of UCIS was to facilitate working with resutls from different (commercial and not commercial) tools. Seems big EDA has different opinion about it - therefore I can see no need for this feature, at least at the moment. If something has changed, please let me know. Maybe you can describe your use case.

@jrpetrus
Copy link

My team has some interest in export_to_ucis(). If I can find some downtime, I'll give it a try with our commercial tool flow and pull down whatever licenses are necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants