More information about formatToParts pages

[SurajKharkwal]

Description

This pull request corrects a JavaScript mistake in the Named Years and Mixed Calendars section of MDN Web Docs. Specifically, it updates the code examples to properly handle formatting options for the Chinese calendar using Intl.DateTimeFormat.

Motivation

The current example contains an error that may lead to confusion or incorrect usage when developers work with named years and mixed calendar formats. Correcting this example ensures clarity and accuracy for MDN readers, helping them better understand the behavior of Intl.DateTimeFormat.

Related issues and pull requests

Fixes : #37609

[github-actions]

Preview URLs (10 pages)

• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/DateTimeFormat/formatRangeToParts
• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/DateTimeFormat/formatToParts
• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/DateTimeFormat/format
• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/DurationFormat/DurationFormat
• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/DurationFormat/formatToParts
• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/ListFormat/formatToParts
• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/ListFormat/format
• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/NumberFormat/formatRangeToParts
• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/NumberFormat/formatToParts
• /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/RelativeTimeFormat/formatToParts

External URLs (1)

URL: /en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/DateTimeFormat/formatToParts
Title: Intl.DateTimeFormat.prototype.formatToParts()

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexagenary_cycle (1 time) (Note! This may be a new URL 👀)

(comment last updated: 2025-01-16 01:29:03)

[Josh-Cena]

I looked at this page and there are many places that could be revised. I went ahead and then decided to propagate these fixes to other formatToParts pages. This makes this PR much bigger than needed but alas, I think this is more ideal. Thank you!