Skip to content

Conversation

drusellers
Copy link

Closes #53

Went through adding optional support by adding a new keyword to the macro has optional. I have not gone through and added all of the matches yet, I wanted to check with the maintainers and see if there was a better suggestion for implementing the macro, but this works today.

@drusellers
Copy link
Author

@michiel - are you still maintaining this project? If not I totally understand. Just looking to get a better understanding of what I should expect. Thank you for your work this was a great help to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow a relationship to be optional
1 participant