-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Static reader node replication #113
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Going to simplify |
noria-server/src/controller/inner.rs
Outdated
// Typically, we are looking for a single egress node that connects the leaf to | ||
// readers in other domains. | ||
// TODO: if each reader (including the 1st) definitely gets its own domain, this | ||
// code can be a lot simpler. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How much is "a lot"? I think we should favor simplicity then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Where did we end up with this? I vaguely remember discussing the outstanding issues with @fintelia before the holidays. |
Last I recall query removal was being corrected because it didn't properly handle deletion of non-reader nodes. I'm not sure what the current status is |
@fintelia I don't have any more changes to make. Is there a case you're concerned about in particular? It looks like the old code removes non-reader nodes in reverse topological order before it reaches my code for removing leaf/reader nodes, so it shouldn't be affected. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This version looks good to me. I've suggested a couple stylistic changes, but the logic seems fine
noria-server/src/controller/inner.rs
Outdated
); | ||
// The nodes we remove first do not have children any more | ||
for node in &nodes { | ||
assert_eq!( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couldn't this check have been done when node is added to the collection?
noria-server/src/controller/inner.rs
Outdated
.next() | ||
.unwrap(); | ||
assert!(self.ingredients[child].is_egress()); | ||
Some(child) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the only branch that returns Some()
. Why not just place the if statement from below right here instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good!
Place replicas in separate domains, including when there is only 1 replica. Place these domains round robin on separate workers. (
migrate/mod.rs
)Support for removing all reader replicas along with a view. (
controller/inner.rs
)Obtain views to replicas round robin. CLI options to set replicas and reader threads.
Benchmarks: 16 client threads and cores, 4 Noria servers with 1 core per server, 1 write every 100 on the vote benchmark. As number of replicas increases, Noria can handle a greater number of ops/s before falling behind.
Tests: Same as before, with updated node counts to account for additional replicas. One new test to check that view actually returns different replicas, and that writes are reflected in these replicas.