Add option for immediate execution in McpSyncServer #371
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add the ability to decide whether or not to use blocking code offloading in
McpSyncServer
. Turning it off allows for the propagation ofThreadLocal
s.Motivation and Context
I use this with Spring Security. Authentication data about the JWT that was used in the request is stored in a ThreadLocal. With
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.boundedElastic()))
, thread hops are introduced in blocking scenarios, and thread locals are lost.In select case, when the user is sure they are NOT in a reactive context, they might want to enable "immediate execution", on the thread that calls
.block()
, for example in theMcpSyncServerExchange
, and preserve thread locals.How Has This Been Tested?
Trying this change with a Spring-based sample, using Spring Security to pass the
SecurityContext
and authentication information.Breaking Changes
None
Types of changes
Checklist
Additional context