Work in progress on tests for verifty_instr function
#2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
olympichek
force-pushed
the
valerii-huhnin@verify-instr-tests
branch
from
5794b86 to
f438c4a
Compare
…l` variant for better compatibility with other functions
witaliy12
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2025
witaliy12
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request adds tests for
verify_instrfunction. Well, actually, not exactly: this pull request adds tests forverifyfunction, which callsverify_instr. These tests would be used to establish equivalence of this function and its' simulation in Coq.