-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[review] MIP-54: The Biarritz Model #54
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
MIP/mip-54/README.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ | |||
# MIP-54: The Biarritz Model | |||
- **Description**: Proposes an AB-FFS L2 model that features on a Governed Gas Pool, Bridge Insurance Fund, and moderate operational assumptions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does "AB-FFS" mean? (Google not helping)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be NB-FFS. NB = native bridge, FFS = MIP-34.
AB was abbreviation for atomic bridge, but we moved on from that name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Eventually all own abbreviations should go into the Movement glossary. but its wip
Why have the informer and the relayer be separate services? Unless they're just illustrated separately for clarity. |
The relayer should monitor that
This helps to check that
making them the same service seems to remove partially the point of an informer |
Summary