Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
openh264: update to 2.6.0
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@Biswa96
Biswa96 committed Feb 19, 2025
1 parent 3ef0aec commit 3aeb27c
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions mingw-w64-openh264/PKGBUILD
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
_realname=openh264
pkgbase=mingw-w64-${_realname}
pkgname="${MINGW_PACKAGE_PREFIX}-${_realname}"
pkgver=2.5.0
pkgver=2.6.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Library for encoding/decoding H264/AVC video streams (mingw-w64)"
arch=('any')
Expand All @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ source=(
"${_realname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz"::"https://github.com/cisco/openh264/archive/v${pkgver}.tar.gz"
"0001-openh264-install-executables.patch"
)
sha256sums=('94c8ca364db990047ec4ec3481b04ce0d791e62561ef5601443011bdc00825e3'
sha256sums=('558544ad358283a7ab2930d69a9ceddf913f4a51ee9bf1bfb9e377322af81a69'
'0b1246577b257560b6fae782dd93eabeedcb8d9c87c20d6d7732b79ba14c38d6')

prepare() {
Expand Down

4 comments on commit 3aeb27c

@kmilos
Copy link
Contributor

@kmilos kmilos commented on 3aeb27c Feb 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, the soversion went up in Arch: https://archlinux.org/todo/openh264-260/

@kmilos
Copy link
Contributor

@kmilos kmilos commented on 3aeb27c Feb 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, looks like it was bumped only in the Makefile but not in meson.build: cisco/openh264@v2.5.0...v2.6.0 @Biswa96

Luckily it seems to be only additions...

Edit: already reported upstream.

@Biswa96
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even if there was a soversion bump, grokker did not show any changes in CI.

@kmilos
Copy link
Contributor

@kmilos kmilos commented on 3aeb27c Feb 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

grokker did not show any changes in CI

Sure, because it was (unused yet) additions only... The filename should change thus requiring rebuilds, but I guess it's not a huge issue to let it slide until the next update...

Please sign in to comment.