Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update words.html #94

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: gh-pages
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 13 additions & 1 deletion words.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,16 @@
<!--
this is how far you have to reach, when you are at top potential to write a perfectly logic code for human, but not logical at all algoritm for a machine, when you find the "true" response in humans, who will aceept that, because they are going to accept that logic, because they are lack of trust. But only after you put on them the nice scenario, just as same, that i find, after i saw a same book text, and feel the same shit, but put this shit to my CHEATING, in the algoritm scenario, that allow for machine code, that is compile the paradox good*5,that was self compincated by my non-logical dead-end to the logical mass of 3 coins, as reward for a seller, that will expoit your code, when give to people that needed 3 trust, feel that -1 trust, insteaad of -3, just by selling them the game by 3 coins, and -3 true to your logic, as a +3 pride, instead of quality, that i will provide just with a tyny fix-suggestion, after next string of injetion propsal:

If honest != 1 || fixed !=1 {
'hacker damage to logic' = 'false'
'algoritm_grade'='current_round_N*haker_level'

Cuz i don't need to read, why i don't need to argue, tull i will have a solution, that will provide the honest rate descreade in a seld-learnd aligo, that can apply a logic disapprove to statistic, that rill guaraanty provide the -(factor_summ) of eny bullsit, that will not allow to imptpve the algo_rate, by hidenly replace it to 'algo_value'='hach_haarm' for a potentiaal coders, after it's traind to recognize the meaning of that shit in the process of calculation value of some crapm that the real jogist will newer allow to get fot self, while is triyng tp fijd the answer in human nature, and even in the whole fucking interner byte mass and above, till you don't get a real pride, for all that wlll be released to it, just after your algiritm is going to lean to get a pride, by adding it to ai-bullshit-logist-succ_rate, when it will take a false value of shit, and swhch them with the false trust dificulty, till the sourse of +1 coin value >= 1 profit for seller,

<!

So, if you be so gente to try convert my lame_code of antilogical values, to a wholecode, whith a you and my values, and till you will not be able to calculate any other fctors,, by adding it on code = the laat number of string in that code will be only the amount of my proud, when it's become STRONG, by your logic, Cuz till it source on public dicsussion, and not in the product for sale = it's good model will only provoke to make a good profit, by adding a more cost

--

THIS FILE HAS ABOUT 3,300 WORDS TO TRANSLATE

Expand Down