Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fairmat 2024: proposal on photoemission spectroscopy (MPES) #1424

Open
wants to merge 1,170 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lukaspie
Copy link
Contributor

@lukaspie lukaspie commented Sep 24, 2024

This brings in the application definition NXmpes together with its specialization NXmpes_arpes and NXxps and related new base classes.

lukaspie and others added 30 commits July 9, 2024 12:15
…NXms with NXmicrostructure to avoid confusing the symbol convention with mass spectrometry as the abbreviation NXms may suggest
…con and eventually make this NXmicrostructure
…ate_system_set because that is what these conventions only talk about
Small modifications to clarify NXmpes
@lukaspie lukaspie marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2024 09:17
@lukaspie lukaspie linked an issue Sep 29, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@rayosborn
Copy link
Contributor

This PR wants to create more than a dozen new base classes, along with major changes to several more, and yet there is minimal description of why they are needed and the links to other issues or other PRs provide little additional information. IMHO, it is impossible for the NIAC to assess such a huge PR as a single entity. I would suggest that there needs to be a separate PR for each base class, new or modified, containing a detailed explanation of why the PR is needed. This will slow the process down considerably, so at the next Telco I would suggest we discuss how to handle such a backlog, e.g., by assigning a couple of members to review each one and report back with comments so that we can have an expedited discussion and vote. However, I would recommend withdrawing this PR until we have decided how to proceed.

@sanbrock sanbrock mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NXmpes
8 participants