Fix some broken links #423
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Using [] without anything between them makes them render oddly, one internal link was missing the # before the fragment, and the RFC6749 section 7 link didn't work I think as RFC6749 uses #rfc.section rather than just #section.
leecam
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2024
tplooker
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2024
c2bo
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2024
awoie
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2024
Sakurann
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using [] without anything between them makes them render oddly, one internal link was missing the # before the fragment, and the RFC6749 section 7 link didn't work I think as RFC6749 uses #rfc.section rather than just #section.