Skip to content

8315130: java.lang.IllegalAccessError when processing classlist to create CDS archive #24223

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

TimPushkin
Copy link
Contributor

@TimPushkin TimPushkin commented Mar 25, 2025

If a base class is package-private then its subclasses should have the same package name and defining class loader, otherwise IllegalAccessError is thrown when linking a subclass. Currently when dumping a static archive separate URLClassLoaders are used for each unregistered classes' source. Thus if two unregistered classes, a package-private base class and a sub class, from the same package reside in different sources IllegalAccessError will be thrown when linking the sub class. This can be unexpected because the app could have used a single class loader for both classes and thus not have seen the error — see DifferentSourcesApp.java from this patch for an example of such app.

This patch fixes the issue by using a single class loader for all unregistered classes. CDS does not allow classes with the same name making such solution possible.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author)

Issue

  • JDK-8315130: java.lang.IllegalAccessError when processing classlist to create CDS archive (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24223/head:pull/24223
$ git checkout pull/24223

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24223
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24223/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24223

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24223

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24223.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 25, 2025

👋 Welcome back tpushkin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 25, 2025

@TimPushkin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8315130: java.lang.IllegalAccessError when processing classlist to create CDS archive

Reviewed-by: iklam, ccheung

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 515 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@iklam, @calvinccheung) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 25, 2025

@TimPushkin The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Timofei, thanks for fixing this.

(Sorry I didn't notice this PR until now ...)

I have a suggestion for further simplification.

@TimPushkin TimPushkin requested a review from iklam April 10, 2025 06:12
@iklam
Copy link
Member

iklam commented Apr 15, 2025

/reviewers 2

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 15, 2025

@iklam
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 2 (with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author).

Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have one comment in CDS.java.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 16, 2025

@TimPushkin this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout one-loader
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Apr 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review and removed merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch labels Apr 16, 2025
@TimPushkin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Besides adding the warnings I noticed that UnregisteredClassLoader is omitted from the dump and implemented the same for UnregisteredClassLoader$Source and its implementations.

Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found an issue on the RegUnregSuperTest.java.

Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me overall. I just have a request for cleaning up ClassListParser::check_supertype_overshadowing()

@TimPushkin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, had to pause working on this for some time because of other stuff.

I believe I have addressed all the existing comments now.

Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@iklam
Copy link
Member

iklam commented May 14, 2025

Sorry, had to pause working on this for some time because of other stuff.

I believe I have addressed all the existing comments now.

Thanks for making the changes. Once this PR has 2 reviews and is final, I will run some tests in our test pipeline.

Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 14, 2025
@TimPushkin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you!

Once this PR has 2 reviews and is final, I will run some tests in our test pipeline.

@iklam It is final, please run the tests.

@TimPushkin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label May 15, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 15, 2025

@TimPushkin
Your change (at version a3b7dd9) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@iklam
Copy link
Member

iklam commented May 16, 2025

I have merged your PR with the latest repo and running tiers 1-4 in our CI. Waiting for the results now.

@iklam
Copy link
Member

iklam commented May 16, 2025

Tests passed.
Thank you @TimPushkin for contributing this fix to OpenJDK!
/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 16, 2025

Going to push as commit 46a12e7.
Since your change was applied there have been 535 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels May 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 16, 2025

@iklam @TimPushkin Pushed as commit 46a12e7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants