Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TRUNK-6252: Conditional resource path should be interpreted as a globs #4830

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

k4pran
Copy link
Contributor

@k4pran k4pran commented Nov 9, 2024

Description of what I changed

This PR updates the logic to use globs instead of regex when matching conditional resources. This logic is only applied to config versions 2.0 and onwards, earlier config.xml versions will still use regex.

The default pattern is glob:**/%s to make it agnostic to absolute paths, allowing users to focus on matching relative paths instead.

This change also includes adding the config.xml version to the Module class as configVersion to allow us to check if we should use glob or regex logic. This PR also uses the ModuleUtil.matchRequiredVersions function as this seems to work well for configVersions that only have two parts like 2.0.

I tried to add parameterized tests to cover different glob input patterns and config versions, please let me know if you notice any other patterns that should be included.

Issue I worked on

see https://issues.openmrs.org/browse/TRUNK-6252

Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)

  • My IDE is configured to follow the code style of this project.

    No? Unsure? -> configure your IDE, format the code and add the changes with git add . && git commit --amend

  • I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored
    existing code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)

    No? -> write tests and add them to this commit git add . && git commit --amend

  • I ran mvn clean package right before creating this pull request and
    added all formatting changes to my commit.

    No? -> execute above command

  • All new and existing tests passed.

    No? -> figure out why and add the fix to your commit. It is your responsibility to make sure your code works.

  • My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.

    No? Unsure? -> execute command git pull --rebase upstream master

@k4pran k4pran marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2024 16:29
@ibacher ibacher changed the title TRUNK-6252 Conditional resource path should be interpreted as a globs TRUNK-6252: Conditional resource path should be interpreted as a globs Nov 13, 2024
@@ -644,7 +648,15 @@ public Document getConfig() {
public void setConfig(Document config) {
this.config = config;
}


public String getConfigVersion() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, added

@@ -405,6 +408,41 @@ static boolean shouldResourceBeIncluded(Module module, URL fileUrl, String openm
return include;
}

static boolean isMatchingConditionalResource(Module module, URL fileUrl, ModuleConditionalResource conditionalResource) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you intentionally decide not to make this method private?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes it was intentional, I think it was important to unit test this method separately from shouldResourceBeIncluded to make sure it is returning true/false based on the pattern matching rather than the logic of shouldResourceBeIncluded. I made it package-private for this reason.

@dkayiwa dkayiwa merged commit fd0685a into openmrs:master Nov 15, 2024
6 checks passed
wikumChamith pushed a commit to wikumChamith/openmrs-core that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
wikumChamith pushed a commit to wikumChamith/openmrs-core that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
wikumChamith pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants