-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TRUNK-6252: Conditional resource path should be interpreted as a globs #4830
Conversation
@@ -644,7 +648,15 @@ public Document getConfig() { | |||
public void setConfig(Document config) { | |||
this.config = config; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
|
|||
public String getConfigVersion() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we put @since
annotations on these? https://openmrs.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/docs/pages/25477044/Java+Conventions#New-Public-Methods-and-Classes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, added
@@ -405,6 +408,41 @@ static boolean shouldResourceBeIncluded(Module module, URL fileUrl, String openm | |||
return include; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
static boolean isMatchingConditionalResource(Module module, URL fileUrl, ModuleConditionalResource conditionalResource) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you intentionally decide not to make this method private?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes it was intentional, I think it was important to unit test this method separately from shouldResourceBeIncluded
to make sure it is returning true/false based on the pattern matching rather than the logic of shouldResourceBeIncluded
. I made it package-private for this reason.
…rather than a Regex
…rather than a Regex (openmrs#4830) (cherry picked from commit fd0685a)
…rather than a Regex (openmrs#4830) (cherry picked from commit fd0685a)
Description of what I changed
This PR updates the logic to use globs instead of regex when matching conditional resources. This logic is only applied to config versions 2.0 and onwards, earlier config.xml versions will still use regex.
The default pattern is
glob:**/%s
to make it agnostic to absolute paths, allowing users to focus on matching relative paths instead.This change also includes adding the config.xml version to the
Module
class asconfigVersion
to allow us to check if we should use glob or regex logic. This PR also uses theModuleUtil.matchRequiredVersions
function as this seems to work well for configVersions that only have two parts like 2.0.I tried to add parameterized tests to cover different glob input patterns and config versions, please let me know if you notice any other patterns that should be included.
Issue I worked on
see https://issues.openmrs.org/browse/TRUNK-6252
Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)
My IDE is configured to follow the code style of this project.
No? Unsure? -> configure your IDE, format the code and add the changes with
git add . && git commit --amend
I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored
existing code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)
No? -> write tests and add them to this commit
git add . && git commit --amend
I ran
mvn clean package
right before creating this pull request andadded all formatting changes to my commit.
No? -> execute above command
All new and existing tests passed.
No? -> figure out why and add the fix to your commit. It is your responsibility to make sure your code works.
My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.
No? Unsure? -> execute command
git pull --rebase upstream master