-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
Copy pathFFR_chap23.txt
2059 lines (1348 loc) · 73.2 KB
/
FFR_chap23.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
CHAPTER 23
ENGINEERING DESIGN
23-1. RracTtor Drusiay*
The LMFR readily lends itself to a wide variety of designs and arrange-
ments. The concepts proposed to date may be classified according to type
as being internally or externally cooled and either compact or open ar-
rangement of cycle. Such clagssification has been brought about in an at-
tempt to present designs which minimize bismuth and uranium inventories.
If we assume the cost of U235 to be $20/g and that of bismuth to be
$2.25/1b, a U-Bi solution of 700 ppm uranium by weight would cost ap-
proximately $6000/ft3. This high volume cost makes it very important to
design the LMFR with the minimum possible holdup.
In addition to the variety of cycle arrangements, several different
coolants are possible, The U-Bi may be used directly to produce steam, or
a secondary fluid such as NaK or sodium may be used. The LMFR has
also been proposed as the heat source for a closed-eycele, gas-turbine power
plant [2].
23-1.1 Externally cooled LMFR. In an externally cooled LMFR the
fuel is circulated through the core to an external heat exchanger, where the
heat is removed by the secondary fluid. This type provides the simplest
core design, requiring simply an assembly of graphite pierced with holes
for ecirculation of liquid-metal fuel. The major problems of heat transter
are essentially removed from the core design.
23-1.2 Internally cooled LMFR. The internally cooled LMFR is de-
signed so that the liquid fuel remains in the reactor core. The core thus
acts as a heat exchanger in which the heat is transferred to a secondary
fluid flowing through it to an external heat exchanger or steam generator.
The internally cooled design offers a means of substantially reducing
the U—DBi inventory of the system, but considerably complicates the design
of the core. The core must be designed to accommodate two fluids and suf-
ficient surface for transferring heat from one to the other. The introduction -
of a secondary fluid in the core requires a greater uranium concentration
than in the externally cooled system, which has only U-Bi and graphite in
the core. The required concentration cannot be achieved with U-DB1 so-
*Based on material by T. V. Sheehan, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
L. I, New York.
832
23-1] REACTOR DESIGN 833
From
Recuperator
To Turbine
J .
\ Volatile
Fission Prod.
~——Pump
S
U-Bi
n Core
Heat Exchanger Graphite Reflector
Dump
Fic. 23-1. Externally cooled compact arrangement LMFR for closed-cycle gas
turbine.
lutions, since these concentrations approach the solubility limits for the
temperatures presently being considered (400 to 550°C).
23-1.3 Compact arrangements. The compact arrangement may best be
described as an integral or “pot type” design and may be internally or ex-
ternally cooled. In such a design [1] the fluid fuel remains in the core ex-
cept for small amounts which are withdrawn for reprocessing. The breeding
fluid acts as a coolant by circulating through blanket and core and thence
through heat exchangers which are also contained within the primary
reactor vessel,
Figure 23-1 shows a concept of an externally cooled compact reactor
834 ENGINEERING DESIGN [cHAP, 23
arrangement for a closed-cycle, gas-turbine power plant [2]. In this ar-
rangement the fuel is circulated through the core and heat exchanger,
which are contained inside the same vessel. The compact arrangement
offers a means of reducing the U-Bi inventory over a particular reactor
designed with an open-cycle arrangement. It does, however, increase the
problems associated with design of the core, blanket, and reactor vessel.
The compacting of all the equipment into a single vessel reduces the flexi-
bility of mechanical design which the open arrangement allows, as well as
intensifying the problems of thermal expansion. The reactor vessel not
only becomes larger, but the number of openings is also increased, both of
which complicate the vessel design. Nevertheless, as operating experience
with materials and equipment becomes available, the compact arrange-
ment may provide a means of improving the economics of the LMFR
system.
23-1.4 Open arrangements. The open arrangement is the type receiving
the most consideration at present because of the flexibility and simplicity
of design it affords the system components. Figure 23-2 shows one con-
cept of an externally cooled LMFR using the open-cycle arrangement [3].
In this design both blanket and core fluids are circulated to heat ex-
changers located outside the reactor vessel. This type of arrangement also
allows greater freedom of design for maintenance of equipment. Means
must be provided for removal and/or maintenance of system components
under radioactive conditions. The open arrangement makes it easier to
provide such facilities. The major disadvantage of this arrangement is the
high U-Bi inventory.
The open-cycle arrangement may also be employed in an internally
cooled LMFR to reduce fuel inventory, but it introduces those problems
peculiar to internally cooled systems.
23-1.5 Containment and safety requirements. The high negative tem-
perature coefficient and low amount of excess reactivity available make the
LMFR inherently stable and safe. However, any rupture of the primary
system, whether by reactor excursion or otherwise, would release fission
products and polonium to the surrounding atmosphere. The primary
system must therefore be surrounded with a secondary vessel for contain-
ment of radioactivity in case of such a failure. Since all materials in the
reactor core have very low vapor pressures, the containment vessel need
not be designed to withstand any appreciable pressure. The containment
problem in the LMFR 1s one of containing the high-temperature liquid
metal together with fission products, and such containment can be ac-
complished by lining the reactor and primary circuit cells with a gastight
steel membrane. This containment vessel also acts as a catch basin for
recovery of U-Bi in case of leaks.
23-1]
REACTOR DESIGN
i
’? Saturated 600
| Steam To Super-
‘ heater
| Sodium Inlet
And Qutlet Box
835
- ——4"" "3+ Na To Superheater
And Reheater
Reheat And Superheat
Liquid Metal Pumps
-
Water Inlet ,[ -! { ‘
and ol )
Outlet Box E!! ! S jE
Gas Takeoff
o —
Processed Th-Bi
Slurry Return
Boiler Bundle 4
Slurry Suction
#° Header
Blanket
(Th-Bi, Graphite)
—
Liquid Metc|t
To Fuel e 4
4_=V/___ T
Processing
System —=
=
S
Vo
1
Superheat + Reheat
Bundle
oo e Slurry Drawoff
Grc:ph:te Core
From Slurry
Coolers
To Slurry
Coolers
Slurry
"/ Discharge
Header
Fig. 23-2. Externally cooled open-cycle arrangement LMFR.
{
I
-
To Fuel
Th-Bi Slurry Pump
Dump
Liquid Fuel Pumps
The arrangement of the containment vessel also depends on the heat-
removal design. If an intermediate heat-transfer fluid such as sodium or
Nal\ is used, the containment may be handled as above. If a direct U-Bi to
steam cycle is used, a double-wall heat exchanger must be used to maintain
double containment, unless the entire building is constructed to act as the
second containment barrier.
In the event of a leak in the system, the U~-Bi would be drained to a
dump tank. This tank would be provided with adequate cooling to remove
the decay heat from fission products.
23-1.6 Design methods. The vessels in an LMFR are designed in ac-
cordance with the Code for Unfired Pressure Vessels [4]. Vessels would be
of welded construction with all seams radiographed and stress-relieved.
The design temperature used can be as high as 1100°F. For 22% Cr-1%
Ao steel, this gives allowable stresses of 4200 psi for normal operating condi-
tions and 9200 psi for emergency, short-duration conditions. These figures
correspond to 19 creep strength for 100,000 hr and 10,000 hr, respectively.
836 ENGINEERING DESIGN fcHAP. 23
23-1.7 Maintenance and repair provisions. Provisions for maintenance
and repair of the LMFR raise several problems. It is anticipated that a
substantial level of activity will be induced in the system by the circulating
fuel. This means that the system should be designed so that it can be main-
tained despite the high radiation level. Several approaches, not mutually
exclusive, to this problem are being considered:
(1) If maintenance or repair to a component is required, the entire com-
ponent will be removed from the system and a new one inserted.
(2) All connections between components will be made in one area, fully
biologically shielded from the components themselves. When a com-
ponent is to be removed, its connections are shiclded from adjacent connee-
tions by portable shielding if the work is to be done directly rather than re-
motely. The connections are broken and the shielding is removed above the
pipes leading to the component in question. The component is removed
with the overhead crane and a new one set in place. The shielding is re-
placed, and the connections are remade. The connections are accessible
and pipes do not overlay each other so as to prevent removal of any
disconnected component. Unfortunately, placing all connections in one
channel increases the fuel inventory since the piping for this arrangement is
somewhat longer than that required for & more conventional arrangement.
(3) Both mechanical and welded connections are being studied, with a
view toward the ease with which connections can be made and broken both
directly and remotely.
(4) Remote methods of performing maintenance tasks (welding and cut-
ting pipe, making and breaking flanged joints and closures) are being
studied, since direct maintenance will not be possible in some areas.
(5) Fluidized powders, shot, and liquids are being studied as possible
portable shielding media.
23-2. HeaT TRANSFER®
In the open-cycle externally cooled, two-fluid LMFR, the bismuth-
uranium solution serves as the primary coolant as well as the fuel. In the
reactor itself, there is no actual heat transfer. Instead, the solution acts as
a transporter of heat to an external heat exchanger. In evaluating bismuth
as a primary coolant, it is helpful to make a comparison between it and
three other coolants: sodium, a typical alkali metal coolant; LiCI-KCl
cutectic, a typical alkali halide salt mixture; and water. (The salt eutectic
used here would not be a suitable primary coolant for a thermal reactor.
Its heat transfer properties, however, are typical of salt coolants.)
*Based on material by O. E. Dwyer, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
23-2] HEAT TRANSFER 837
The ideal primary coolant for a nuclear power reactor should have the
following characteristics:
(1) High heat-transfer rates.
(2) Good gamma, absorptivity.
(3) Low pumping power requirements.
(4) Low melting point.
(5) Low vapor pressure.
(6) Low corrosion rate.
(7) Low chemical reactivity.
(8) Low neutron absorption.
(9) Low induced radioactivity.
(10) Low cost.
In order to have the above characteristics, the coolant should have the
following physical properties in either a high or low amount:
(1) Density (high): affects pumping power requirements, heat-transfer
characteristics, and gamma shielding requirements.
(2) Thermal conductivity (high): affects heat-transfer characteristics.
(31 Specific heat (high): affects heat-transfer characteristics and coolant
flow rate.
(4) Viscosity (low): affects pumping power requirements and heat-
transfer characteristics.
(5) Melting point (low): affects auxiliary heating requirements.
() Vapor pressure (low): affects mechanical design of reactor and system
components.
(71 Volume change on fusion (low): affects startup and shutdown pro-
cedures.
(81 Coefficient of volumetric expansion (high): affects thermal pumping
capacity and, where primary coolant is also the fuel, reactor reactivity.
(91 Electrical resistivity (low): affects applicability of electromagnetic
pumps.
Table 23-1 summarizes the physical properties of bismuth which are
relevant to nuclear reactor design and in the temperature range of practical
interest from the standpoint of electrical power generation [5,6].
23-2.1 Nuclear aspects of coolants. From the nuclear standpoint, five
important characteristics of primary reactor coolants are their capacities
for (1) absorbing thermal neutrons, (2) slowing down neutrons to the
thermal energy level, (3) absorbing gamma radiation, (4) developing in-
duced radioactivity, and (5) resisting radiation damage.
In Table 23-2 the thermal neutron absorption cross section and neutron-
slowing-down power of Bi are compared with those of Na and H20. Bis-
338 ENGINEERING DESIGN [cHAP. 23
TasLE 23-1
PaYsicalL ProprerTIES oF BIsMUTH
Atomic weight 209
Melting point 271.0°C (520°F)
Boiling point 1477°C (2691°F)
Volume change on
fusion —3.329,
Temperature, °C 300 400 500 600
Temperature, °F 572 752 932 1112
Vapor pressure,
mm Hg 1079® 3.5X107%*12.3x1074)6.3 x 1074
Density, g/cm? 10.03 9.91 9.79 9.66
Specific heat,
cal/(gm)(°C) 0.0343 0.0354 0.0365 0.0376
Viscosity, centipoises 1.66 1.37 1.16 1.00
Thermal conduetivity,
Btu/(hr)(ft)(°F) 9.9 9.0 9.0 9.0
Electrical resistivity,
ohms 128.9 134 .2 139.8 145.2
U solubility, ppm 480 1850 5100 13000
*Extrapolated results.
muth with a macroscopic cross section of 9.0 X 107% em~! at 450°C has
the lowest neutron absorption characteristic of any practical coolant, with
the exception of D20 and certain gases. Its “reactor poisoning’ effect is
at least an order of magnitude below those of sodium and water. The
slowing-down power of Bi i1s very low, however, which means that when it is
used as the primary coolant in a thermal reactor it contributes very little
moderating capacity. The term £No, in Table 23-2 represents the decrease
in the natural logarithm of the neutron energy per centimeter of travel
through coolant.
The gamma absorption coefficient, u, is defined by the equation
dl = —uldx (23-1)
and has the units of em™! Values of u for 450°C Bi at several gamma
energies are shown in Table 23-3, along with those for Na and H:O.
Bismuth, because of its high density, 1s an excellent absorber of gamma
radiation, which means that it provides considerable internal shielding.
The values presented in Table 23-3 are estimates based on the theoretical
calculations of Davission and Evans [8].
23-2]
HEAT TRANSFER 839
TaBLE 23-2
SomME NUCLEAR PROPERTIES OF VARIOUS REAcTOR COOLANTS
Thermal Macero- Thermal q
. . Slowing-
neutron scople scattering "
£ down
Coolant Temp.,| cross Cross Cross | o ot one power
°C |section [7],} section [7],; Density| section, 1 o
: ess (No,
Ua) ?\ aO', :O) Us? _.1!
barns em ! g/cm3 | barns em
Bi 450 0.032 0.00090 | 9.82 9 0.0095 | 0.0024
Na 450 0.505 0.011 0.841 4.0 0.084 0.0074
H.0 250 — 0.018 0.802 — 1.23
*Average decrease in the natural logarithm of the neutron energy per collision.
TABLE 23-3
VALUES oF u, THE GaMMA ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT,
FOoR VARIOUS REacTOR Co0OLANTS A8 A FuncTioN oF ENERGY
Energy, Mev
. Temp.,
Coolant °C
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0
| Bi 450 1.57 0.70 0.52 0.44 0.41
; Na 450 0.070 0.051 0.042 0.036 0.029
-0 250 0.078 0.057 (.046 0.039 (.032
Regarding the tendency for developing induced radioactivity, Bi has a
serioux disadvantage, owing to the formation of Po?!Y a very energetic
alpha emitter with a 138.3-day half-life. Its formation and decay can be
represented as follows:
Bir(19mb) —_y. 3j210 ;6, Po2l0 — % Pp206
5d 138.3d
0?7 is one of the most poisonous materials known, the maximum allow-
able concentration in air being 7 X 107 ue/ml or 3.75 X 1078 ppm.
Another troublesome feature of Po2!% is its tendency to scatter throughout
840 ENGINEERING DESIGN [cHAP. 23
any accessible volume, due to recoil from its high-energy alpha emission.
Thus, spillage of solutions containing Po?!? constitutes a most serious phys-
1ological hazard. Inthe LMFR, however, it is not believed that the presence
of Po?!0 in the fuel stream creates a more serious radioactivity problem
than already exists as a result of the fission products.
Sodium is not free of the radioactivity problem either, but as a primary
coolant it is not as bad in this respect as Bi. Water is comparatively free
of induced radioactivity after short holdup times. For the same flux
conditions, Na will give over 20,000 times as much radioactivity, on a
roentgen basis, as HoO.
Liquid metals, because of their simple atomic structure, suffer no radia-
tion damage.
23-2.2 Pumping-power requirements. An important criterion for as-
sessing the relative merits of different coolants is the amount of pumping
power required for a fixed rate of heat removal in a given application. The
three main pressure drops in the primary coolant circuit are those in the
reactor, the external heat exchanger, and the interconnecting piping. A
comparison of the four different types of coolants will now be made on the
basis of their relative pumping-power requirements, with respect to the
interconnecting piping and the heat exchangers. The physical properties
of the coolants are listed in Table 23-4. The properties of the first three
are evaluated at 450°C, as a typical average primary coolant temperature
for such coolants, and those for water at 250°C.
TAaBLE 234
PuaysicaL ProrERTIES oF SoME Tyrical Rracror CooLANTS
Property Bi Na KCHLiCl H.0
450°C 450°C 450°C 250°C
Melting point, °F 520 208 664 32
Boiling point, °F 2691 1621 — 212
Density, 1b/ft3 615 52.5 103 o0.0
Specific heat, Btu/(1b)(°F) 0.036 0.304 0.31 1.16
Heat capacity, Btu/(ft3)(°F) 22.1 15.95 31.9 57.8
Thermal conductivity,
Btu/(hr) (ft)(°F) 8.95 39.5 1.47 0.357
Viscosity, ep 1.28 0.245 3.4 0.110
Prandtl number, C'p, u/k 0.0125 0.00454 1.7 0.863
23-2] HEAT TRANSFER 841
The pumping power required to circulate the coolant through the piping
system per unit rate of heat transport for a fixed temperature rise in the
coolant has been shown [9] to be
: 02
bp = % = (a constant) ;#GF. (23-2)
The quantity u%2/p2C,28, represented here by the symbol X, is an index
of the pumping power required to circulate a coolant through a fixed
piping system, for a given heat load. Table 23-5 gives relative values of X
for the four typical coolants mentioned above. The units and values of the
physical properties used in evaluating X are the same as those given in
Table 23—4.
TaAaBLE 23-5
RELATIVE VALUES oF X vorR VARriorus COOLANTS
Frowing THrROUGH A FIXED PIPING SYSTEM
Coolant Temp., °C X x 104
Bi 450 308
Na 450 77
LiCHKCI 450 32
eutectic
H.0 250 1.7
The very large spread in pumping-power requirements is striking. Bis-
muth has about four times the pumping-power requirements of sodium and
both have manifold greater requirements than that of water, which has
the least of any known liquid. The tremendous superiority of water as a
heat-transport medium is due to its low viscosity and very high volumetric
heat capacity.
23-2.3 Heat transfer for LMFR. So far as is known, no heat-transfer
data have been obtained for liquid bismuth. However, several investigators
[10-14] have published experimental heat-transfer results on the bismuth
lead eutectic and on mercury. For these results the Lubarski and Koffman
equation [15] expresses the results most closely:
"D 0.625(DV,Ca/R0 (23-3)
842 ENGINEERING DESIGN [cHAP. 23
This equation may be used for turbulent flow in round tubes or for turbulent
flow outside round tubes.
In obtaining the heat-transfer coefficients for comparison with bismuth,
the sodium coeflicients were calculated from the Martinelli-Lyon relation-
ship. The coeflicients for molten salt and water were calculated from the
conventional Dittus-Boelter equation.
Using the above relationships and assuming (1) total fixed heat load,
(2) fixed diameter of tubes, (3) fixed inlet and outlet temperatures, (4) av-
erage bulk temperature of coolants same as in Table 23-4, and (5) combined
heat-transfer resistance of tube wall and second fluid equals 0.001, a typical
value for 1-in. ID alloy steel tubes with 0.1 in. wall the values in Tables
23-6 and 23-7 were calculated. Although the heat-transfer characteristics
of bismuth are slightly inferior to those for sodium, it is clear from these
two sets of calculations that all four coolants hehave similarly.
The heat-transport capability of bismuth are simply related to its volu-
metric heat capacity. The values of this property are given in Table 23-4.
Bismuth is definitely superior to sodium but inferior to the fused salt and
water.
To achieve good thermal contact between bismuth and a solid metal
surface, the surface must be cleaned to a high polish, the bismuth must
be free of oxide and dissolved gases, and the system must be filled under a
high vacuum. Guses or oxides on the heat-transfer surface can greatly
reduce the heat-transfer coefficient for bismuth. Bismuth hags a less stable
oxide than the oxides of iron, chromium, and nickel which may be present
on the tube surfaces. Hence the bismuth would have a tendency to non-
wet the walls.
Good wetting of alloyed steels by bismuth may be achieved by adding
small amounts of alkali or alkaline earth metals, by heating to high tem-
TaBLE 236
CoMPARISON OF CooLANTS IN HEAT-EXCcHANGER DESIGN
WHEN NuMBER oF TUBES IN PARALLEL 18 FIXED
Coolant \o?lgf)? noo U, Relative size of
ft/sec’ Btu/(hr)(ft)2(°F) | Btu/(hr)(ft)2(°F) | heat exchangers
Bi1 15 2700 730 1.00
Na 20.8 10230 910 :
LiCI-KCI 10.4 2400 706 1.12
eutectic
H,0 5.73 2360 703 1.12
23-3] COMPONENT DESIGN 843
peratures (above 1200°F), or by both. FFor good heat transfer with bismuth
extreme care must be taken to ensure oxide- and gas-free systems.
23-2.4 Heat-exchanger design. In a commerecial liquid-metal fuel sys-
tem, the primary bismuth coolant would probably exchange heat with a
secondary metal coolant before generating steam. Typical conditions for
a 5-Mw countercurrent bismuth-sodium heat exchanger are given in
Table 23-8.
23-3. CompoNENT DEsign*®
This section discusses the design and development experience obtained
on components required in LMFR systems. Besides the requirements for
these systems, considerable component development is needed in the re-
search und development program for experimental apparatus. Both kinds
of components are treated here in detail and by case histories,
23-3.1 Pumps. In the case of liquid-metal pumps, which can be classified
as mechonieal or electromagnetie, a good deal of preliminary development
work hax been done by the Iairchild Iingine and Airplane Corporation
Nuclear Fuoerev for Propulsion of Aireraft Division (NEPA), the Allis-
Cliliners Co., the Babeock & Wilcox Co., and the Government Labora-
tories, WAPL, ORNL and ANL [19].
TasLe 23-7
CovMrarisoN oF CooranTts 1N Hear-Excraxcer DEsIGN
AT FIXEDp LiNEAR VELOCITY OF 13 FT, SEC
o
Conlait of tube% Temp., h, U, size of
e | °C Btu/ (W) (i0)2C°F) | Btw/ () (f)2(°F) | heat
parallel exchangers
I3 n 450 2770 730 1.00
N ©1.38n 450 8810 897 0.88
LiC-IKCT 0.6Y9n 450 3200 762 1.03
ertertic
H.0 (¢ 42n 250 5150 837 (.94
*Busceil on a contribution by C. Raseman, H. Susskind, and C. Waide, Brook-
hiaven Nutional Laboratory.
844 ENGINEERING DESIGN [cHAP. 23
TABLE 23-8
TypicaL ConNpITIONS IN A COUNTERCURRENT,
B1-NaA HeaT EXCHANGER
Tube material Low Cr-Steel
Thermal conductivity of tube, Btu/(hr}(ft) (°F) 15.8
Tube inside diameter, in. (.70
Tubhe thickness, in. 0.100
Tube spacing (triangular), in, 0.250
Bi temperature (bulk), °If 850
Bi velocity (outside tubes), ft/sce 15.0
Bi heat transfer coeflicient, Btu/(hr) ({t)2(°I") 3,390
Na temperature (bulk), °F 750
Na veloeity (inside tubes), ft/sec 25.5
Na heat transfer coefficient, Btu/(hr)(ft)2(°F) 12,300
Over-all heat transfer coefficient, Btu/(hr)({t)2(°T) 1,015
Fraction of resistance offered by tube wall 0.60
Heat flux (outside tube surface), Btu/(hr}(ft)?2 101,500
Power density, Btu/(hr)(ft)3 510,000
By, ft3/mw heat 0.56
Na inventory, {t3/mw heat 0.45
Lleetromagnetic pumps. In the early days of the LMI'R project, a mag-
netic pump for Bi was deseribed by B. 'eld and L. Szilard [20,21]. The
Fuel Processing Group of Brookhaven National Laboratory required pilot-
plant pumps that would circulate uranium-hismuth fuel with absolutely
no leakage. The U-DBi fuel was eventually to be circulated through an
experimental hole in the Brookhaven reactor where fission products and
polonium would be generated. Since a small flow rate of approximately
1 gpm was desired and efliciency was of little concern, it was decided to
use an electromagnetic pump.
An experimental loop [22] was set up to circulate nonradioactive U-Bi
by means of a General Eleetric Model G-3 ac (IParaday) electromagnetic
pump. This loop ran continuously for 2400 hr. During the first 160 hr the
rig was operated isothermally at a temperature of 645°F; during the
remainder of the time, the loop was run isothermally at 840°F. The U-Bi
solution was circulated for most of this period at a rate of 1 gpm. There
was no sign of plugging or flow restriction.
The General Electric G=3 ac pump was calibrated (Figs. 23-3 and 23-4)
in another AISI type-347 stainless steel liquid bismuth loop at 930°I°
[22]. It was operated continuously for over 13,000 hr.
23-3] COMPONENT DESIGN 845
0.08 — —
Efficiency, %
0.06 }— —
0.04 — —]
| l | 1 | | i |
0 0.2 04 06 08 1.0 1.2 1.4 16 18
Flow, GPM
Fig.23-3. AC electromagnetic pump efficiency. Molten bismuth in AISI type-347
stainless steel cell. (Manufactured by General Electric Co.)
119}
I | I I [ l
200 Vaolts
8 — —
I —
vy
= 150 Volts
-
o
@
I 4 | —
2 100 Volts -
50 Vaolts
{ | . | | L l 1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Flow, GPM
Frg, 23-4. AC electromagnetic pump characteristics. Molten bismuth in AISI
tvne-347 stainless steel cell. (Manufactured by General Electric Co.)
The =ame pump was used to circulate bismuth at 930°17 in a 239, Cr-19,
Mo steel loop. - The efheiency and characteristic curves were somewhat
lower than those obtalned in a stainless steel loop. This is probably due
1o =hort-circuiting of magnetie flux in the ferritic steel walls.
A theoretical study [23] was prepared by the Atomic Energy Research
Israblishment at Harwell, Iingland, for linear-induction pumping of
bismunth, The report indicates the feasibility of using this type of pump.
Linear-imduction pumps have been built and successfully used at Ames
846 ENGINEERING DESIGN [cHAP. 23
Laboratory to circulate Mg-Th eutectic (37 w/0o Th) and Bi-U alloy
(dbw/oU) in an Inconel-enclosed tantalum loop [24,25]. The pump
operated successtully in the Mg-Th system for 2000 hr at 1470°F with a
temperature differential of 250°I°, and in Bi-U for 5250 hours at 1740°T
with a temperature differential of 210°F. For ecalibration, about 1 gpm
of Bi-U was pumped at 750°F against a head of 0.5 in., with an efliciency
of 0.169.
Mechanical pumps. Most pump development work has been aimed at
pumping sodium or sodium-potassium alloys. The most serious problem
relative to the design of a mechanical Liquid-metal pump appears to be
that of suitable bearings and seals.
Bismuth was pumped by NIEPA in 1950 [26]. The system was operated
for 37 hr, the maximum flow rate measured was 2 gpm, the maximum head
developed was 66 psi, and the maximum bismuth temperature reached was
1765°F. The pump was a modified Browne and Sharpe No. 206, machine-
tool-coolant pump.
In another experiment [27] NIEPA circulated bismuth with a 50-gpm
centrifugal pump for 100 hr at a mean temperature of 1500°L" with a
temperature differential of 500°F. An accumulation 1n the sump of a
residue high in oxide content and dissolved elements reduced the flow and
forced suspension of operation. This residue probably resulted from an
impure inert atmosphere above the liquid metal. The container material
selected was AISI type-:3147 stainless steel which had shown some promise
in bismuth solubility tests at temperatures up to 1800°I.
The California Research and Development Corporation made a survey
of the various types of pumps that might be used for liquid bismuth and
came to the conclusion that a centrifugal pump would best fit the need.
A test unit was built that operated for 1037 hr, and a report [28] stated
that the centrifugal pump proved to be a very satistactory means for cir-
culating bismuth in an isothermal system at 700 to 750°L". This pump and