Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add TAC Member R&Rs #220

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023
Merged

Add TAC Member R&Rs #220

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

afmarcum
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed language for TAC Member R&Rs. This proposal pulls from Walli's P&Ps document and attempts to follow the WG Lead R&Rs format.

Open for feedback and patches. Thank you!

afmarcum and others added 2 commits November 16, 2023 10:48
added additional bylaw, p & p language into Adrianne's initial update

Signed-off-by: CRob <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@lehors lehors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for putting this together.

process/tac-member-R&amp;Rs.md Show resolved Hide resolved
process/tac-member-R&amp;Rs.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
grammar battles are hard

Signed-off-by: CRob <[email protected]>
@steiza steiza requested a review from a team November 22, 2023 14:28
process/tac-member-R&amp;Rs.md Show resolved Hide resolved
process/tac-member-R&amp;Rs.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@lehors lehors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks.

@SecurityCRob SecurityCRob merged commit 99199d3 into main Nov 27, 2023
5 of 7 checks passed
@SecurityCRob SecurityCRob deleted the tac-member-r&rs branch November 27, 2023 13:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants