Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Exposing ServerConfig options #959
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Exposing ServerConfig options #959
Changes from 7 commits
9e2e063
6e9e0f1
49723bf
8637cde
264a1ef
9788f79
40ba009
d3bbf4c
737d45b
07b84de
a1609d8
7d0851d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we want to add
#[non_exhaustive]
to the struct? Would that force consumers to use..Default::default()
when constructing this? i.e. such that adding more fields would not be a breaking change?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wondered the same thing. Consumers can already do that if they want. It's kind of nice that the way it is now you can have your code break if we add some new config option so that you get a chance to look yourself at whether our default works for you. I think I've used this in the past.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't have to fix this here but I think I disagree with past-me here. If you want to do that, just check the changelog. We shouldn't need to bump a major to add new things.
A builder interface would be nice, too.
(I don't propose that we do anything in this PR.)